Anaesthesia
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Assessment of recovery following day-case arthroscopy. A comparison between propofol and isoflurane-based anaesthesia.
Fifty healthy patients, aged 15-45 years, undergoing day-case arthroscopy, participated in a study to assess aspects of recovery and mood. Psychomotor tests, including the p-deletion test and the Trieger dot test, were performed pre-operatively and mood was measured using the mood adjective checklist. Anaesthesia in all patients was induced with propofol and a laryngeal mask airway was inserted immediately. ⋯ The time to discharge was similar in both groups as was the incidence of side effects. There was no difference in mood scores between the groups either at the time of discharge or at 24 h. We conclude that psychomotor recovery is somewhat quicker when isoflurane-based anaesthesia is used for day-case arthroscopy, but other factors, including time to awakening, mood and time to discharge are similar for both techniques.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Metoclopramide and prochlorperazine do not decrease propofol hypnotic requirements.
One hundred patients scheduled for minor surgery were given either saline, metoclopramide 0.1 mg.kg-1 or 0.2 mg.kg-1, or prochlorperazine 0.1 mg.kg-1 or 0.2 mg.kg-1 before induction of anaesthesia with a fixed rate infusion of propofol. Neither metoclopramide nor prochlorperazine reduced the induction dose of propofol. The possibility that these agents increased the induction dose could not be excluded.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Comparison of the reinforced laryngeal mask airway and tracheal intubation for nasal surgery.
Airway maintenance and protection during anaesthesia and recovery provided by the reinforced laryngeal mask airway was compared with the sequential use of a tracheal tube followed by the Guedel airway in 66 patients having anaesthesia for nasal surgery. One patient was withdrawn from the laryngeal mask group because the airway was difficult to position. All patients had an oropharyngeal pack inserted and Moffett's solution instilled into the nasal cavities. ⋯ Contamination of the lower airway occurred in only five patients. During recovery from anaesthesia the laryngeal mask and Guedel airway were well tolerated by most patients, but only the mask laryngeal provided an unobstructed airway in all patients. The laryngeal mask protects the larynx from contamination during and after operation until the return of the patient's own protective reflexes.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
A comparison of the stress response to laryngoscopy. The Macintosh versus the McCoy blade.
The cardiovascular changes and catecholamine concentrations were compared in 20 patients before and after laryngoscopy with either the Macintosh or the McCoy laryngoscope blades. Following induction with fentanyl and thiopentone and muscle relaxation with vecuronium the vocal cords were visualised for 10 s with either the Macintosh or McCoy blade, chosen at random. Heart rate, arterial blood pressure and plasma noradrenaline and adrenaline concentrations were measured before, and at, laryngoscopy, and 1, 3 and 5 min later. ⋯ This was not observed with the McCoy blade. There was no change in plasma adrenaline concentrations with either blade during the 5 min after laryngoscopy when compared to the values before laryngoscopy. It is concluded that the stress response to laryngoscopy is less marked with the use of the McCoy blade and is probably due to a reduction in the force necessary to obtain a clear view of the larynx.
-
The lung injury score is a semi-quantitative system used in the definition and grading of the acute respiratory distress syndrome. It is composed of two, three or four equally weighted components. One component is derived from the chest radiograph, which may contribute up to 50% of the total score. ⋯ Physician 1 significantly overscored (median score 4). The chest radiograph component of the lung injury score can be consistently assessed by radiologists, but significant variations may be introduced when assessed by other clinicians. This has significant implications for the use of the lung injury score in studies of adult respiratory distress syndrome and other studies which incorporate radiographic appearances in the definition.