Anaesthesia
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
A comparison of the effects of tramadol and morphine on gastric emptying in man.
In a previous study using an electrical bioimpedance technique and the paracetamol absorption test, we demonstrated that 0.09 mg.kg-1 of morphine delayed gastric emptying in healthy human volunteers. The aim of this study was to investigate whether analgesic doses of tramadol would cause a delay in gastric emptying similar to conventional opioids. Using the same volunteers and techniques as in our previous study, placebo or tramadol (1 mg.kg-1) was given in a randomised, double-blinded, cross-over placebo-controlled study. ⋯ In our previous study, morphine prolonged t0.5 to 21 (3) min (p < 0.03). The maximum concentration and area under the curve of serum paracetamol concentrations following morphine were significantly different from placebo (p < 0.05) and tramadol (p < 0.05). We conclude that tramadol at a dose of 1 mg.kg-1 does not delay gastric emptying in humans.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Incidence of intra-operative bradycardia. Comparison of atracurium and vecuronium in gynaecological surgery.
Intra-operative bradycardia is one of the most common cardiac arrhythmias observed in clinical anaesthetic practice and can lead to a potentially dangerous outcome. In a randomised double-blind trial, 50 female patients undergoing elective abdominal hysterectomy were divided into two groups. Group I received atracurium and group II received vecuronium as a neuromuscular blocking agent in a balanced anaesthetic technique. ⋯ The two groups were similar in their demographic characteristics. The results showed that there was no statistically significant difference among the two groups regarding the incidence of simple bradycardia. However, the incidence of severe bradycardia or symptomatic bradycardia requiring treatment was significantly higher in the vecuronium group.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Clinical Trial
A comparison of 2% and 1% formulations of propofol for the induction and maintenance of anaesthesia in surgery of moderate duration.
This study, conducted in 110 patients undergoing surgery of moderate duration, compared the pharmacodynamic equivalence, efficacy and safety of 1% and 2% formulations of propofol. Anaesthesia was induced with propofol 2 mg.kg-1 given over 40 s and supplementary bolus injections of propofol were given if needed. There were no significant differences between the groups in mean induction times, total induction doses of propofol, frequency and mean duration of apnoea, fentanyl requirements or mean recovery times (times to eyes opening and to orientation). ⋯ Discomfort on injection occurred in 40% and 52% of those given 1% (n = 55) and 2% (n = 55) propofol, respectively; there was no statistically significant group difference in severity. No major adverse effects were reported. This study showed that the 2% formulation has a similar safety and pharmacodynamic profile to the 1% formulation.
-
This laboratory study was designed to compare the speed of placement of a percutaneous tracheostomy using two common methods and to evaluate any damage caused to the trachea. The same operator who was experienced with both techniques placed 10 percutaneous tracheostomies into a pig tracheal model, five using the Griggs tracheostomy forceps technique and five using the Ciaglia sequential dilatation technique. ⋯ We concluded that the Griggs technique is rapid and in trained hands may be suitable for emergency airway access. In addition, the pig trachea model is easy to set up and provides a very useful training tool.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
The effect of pre-operative administration of bupivacaine compared with its postoperative use.
Eighty patients undergoing lower third molar surgery under general anaesthesia were assigned to one of two groups to receive local anaesthetic blockade either 10 min prior to surgery or after surgery just before leaving the operating theatre. Patients in both groups received the local anaesthetic block whilst unconscious. Pain was assessed using visual analogue scales at 6 h and 1, 3 and 6 days after surgery. ⋯ At no time was it possible to detect any significant difference in pain between the two groups. The administration of local anaesthesia prior to starting surgery does not appear to have any advantage over its postoperative administration in patients undergoing this type of surgery. The local anaesthetic, however, does provide excellent analgesia during the first few hours following surgery.