Anaesthesia
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Propofol anaesthesia and vomiting after myringoplasty in children.
To determine whether propofol anaesthesia reduces the incidence of nausea and vomiting after ear surgery, 40 children aged 4-16 years were randomly assigned to receive either propofol or inhalational anaesthesia. Children in the propofol group had anaesthesia induced with propofol and maintained with propofol-nitrous oxide and those in the inhalational group had anaesthesia induced with thiopentone and maintained with isoflurane-nitrous oxide. Nausea and vomiting were recorded for 24 h after surgery and metoclopramide was offered to children who vomited more than twice. ⋯ The incidence of vomiting was lower in the propofol group during the first 2 h after surgery (0% and 25% propofol and inhalational groups, respectively) (p < 0.05) but was similar at all other time intervals. Rescue anti-emetic was given to two (10%) and eight (40%) children in the propofol and inhalational groups, respectively (p < 0.05). We conclude that propofol anaesthesia alone is not an effective means of preventing vomiting after middle ear surgery in children.
-
Clinical Trial
Patient-maintained propofol sedation. Assessment of a target-controlled infusion system.
We have developed a system which allows patients to operate a target-controlled infusion of propofol to provide sedation and we have studied its use in 36 unpremedicated patients undergoing local and regional anaesthetic procedures lasting 10-280 min. An intravenous propofol infusion was started at a target plasma level of 1 microgram.ml-1. The patient was able to increase the target propofol concentration in 0.2- microgram.ml-1 increments by pressing a demand button. ⋯ The target-controlled infusion system bias was-47% and the inaccuracy was 48%. Patient satisfaction was high and 89% said that they would definitely use the technique again. This technique combines the benefits of target-controlled infusion with patient-controlled feedback and produces safe intra-operative sedation.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Postoperative analgesic effect of intrathecal neostigmine and its influence on spinal anaesthesia.
A clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the postoperative analgesic efficacy and the safety of intrathecal neostigmine in patients undergoing anterior and posterior vaginoplasty under spinal anaesthesia. Thirty-six patients were randomly divided into three groups to receive: normal saline (1 ml), morphine (100 micrograms in 1 ml of saline) or neostigmine (100 micrograms in 1 ml of saline) intrathecally just before a spinal injection of hyperbaric bupivacaine (0.5%, 4 ml). The mean [SD] time to the first analgesic (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug) administration was significantly prolonged by intrathecal neostigmine (10.7 [4.3] h) and morphine (15.3 [3.0] h) compared with saline (4.5 [1.0] h). ⋯ Severe nausea and vomiting, sweating and distress during surgery were the most obvious adverse effects of intrathecal neostigmine. On the other hand, less hypotension was observed in the neostigmine group. The usefulness of intrathecal neostigmine as the sole postoperative analgesic may be restricted by the severity of its adverse effects.
-
In 10 cases of unexpected difficult tracheal intubation using the Macintosh laryngoscope blade, the larynx could not be seen. In each case, a good view was achieved using the Miller blade lateral to the tongue, which enabled tracheal intubation under direct vision. The results achieved using narrow, low-profile straight laryngoscope blades with this technique are reviewed. ⋯ Paraglossal straight blade laryngoscopy may have an advantage over use of the Macintosh technique when intubation proves unexpectedly difficult. It is perhaps time to question standard teaching about the role of the curved blade in such patients or, more particularly, whether the technique of laryngoscopy as currently taught is optimal. The paraglossal straight blade technique needs to be practised in routine intubation before it can be used with confidence in difficult cases.
-
Awake fibreoptic intubation is well established as the optimum method of securing the airway in patients in whom difficulty is anticipated. We report a patient undergoing awake fibreoptic intubation in whom the use of topical local anaesthetic precipitated acute loss of the airway so that urgent surgical intervention was required.