Anaesthesia
-
The term 'dedicated airway' was first used in connection with nasal fibreoptic intubations using the cuffed nasopharyngeal airway. Since that time, the concept has developed and the term has been extended to include fibreoptic intubation techniques involving both the laryngeal mask airway and cuffed oropharyngeal airway. 'Dedicated airway' can now be defined as: 'An upper airway device dedicated to the maintenance of airway patency while other major airway interventions are anticipated or are in progress. ⋯ As well as promoting safe conditions for training fibreoptic intubation in general, there is the particular advantage of being able to train using these techniques in patients known to be difficult to intubate. The authors' evolved clinical experiences in promoting the concept and the relevant literature are reviewed.
-
This study aimed to evaluate whether cricoid pressure is associated with a high risk of gastro-oesophageal reflux. Fifteen awake, fasted volunteers were studied. ⋯ Using continuous oesophageal pH monitoring, no volunteer had gastro-oesophageal reflux during cricoid pressure, although one subject had a reflux spike soon after relieving cricoid pressure. We conclude with 95% confidence that the incidence of gastro-oesophageal reflux during cricoid pressure is not more than 20%.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Target-controlled propofol vs. sevoflurane: a double-blind, randomised comparison in day-case anaesthesia.
We compared target-controlled propofol with sevoflurane in a randomised, double-blind study in 61 day-case patients. Anaesthesia was induced with a propofol target of 8 microgram.ml-1 or 8% sevoflurane, reduced to 4 microgram.ml-1 and 3%, respectively, after laryngeal mask insertion and subsequently titrated to clinical signs. Mean (SD) times to unconsciousness and laryngeal mask insertion were significantly shorter with propofol [50 (9) s and 116 (33) s, respectively] than with sevoflurane [73 (14) s and 146 (29) s; p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0003, respectively]; however, these differences were not apparent to the blinded observer. ⋯ Direct costs were lower with sevoflurane but nausea would have increased indirect costs. Patient satisfaction was high (>/= 90%) with both techniques. In conclusion, both techniques had advantages and disadvantages for day-case anaesthesia.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Hemispheric-synchronisation during anaesthesia: a double-blind randomised trial using audiotapes for intra-operative nociception control.
The possible antinociceptive effect of hemispheric-synchronised sounds, classical music and blank tape were investigated in patients undergoing surgery under general anaesthesia. The study was performed on 76 patients, ASA 1 or 2, aged 18-75 years using a double-blind randomised design. Each of the three tapes was allocated to the patients according to a computer-generated random number table. ⋯ Fentanyl was given intravenously sufficient to keep the intra-operative heart rate and arterial blood pressure within 20% of pre-operative baseline values and the fentanyl requirements were used as a measure of nociception control. Patients to whom hemispheric-synchronised sounds were played under general anaesthesia required significantly less fentanyl compared with patients listening to classical music or blank tape (mean values: 28 microgram, 124 microgram and 126 microg, respectively) (p < 0.001). This difference remained significant when regression analysis was used to control for the effects of age and sex.