Anaesthesia
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Extension of epidural blockade in labour for emergency Caesarean section using 2% lidocaine with epinephrine and fentanyl, with or without alkalinisation.
In a randomised, double-blind study, we investigated rapid extension of epidural analgesia to surgical anaesthesia for emergency Caesarean section. Parturients receiving epidural analgesia in labour who subsequently required Caesarean section were given a test dose of 3 ml lidocaine 2% with epinephrine 1 : 200 000, followed 3 min later by 12 ml lidocaine 2% with epinephrine 1 : 200 000 and fentanyl 75 microg, to which was added 1.2 ml sodium bicarbonate 8.4% (bicarbonate group; n = 20) or saline (saline group; n = 20). ⋯ Maternal side-effects and neonatal outcome were similar between groups. We conclude that pH-adjusted lidocaine 2% with epinephrine and fentanyl is effective for rapidly establishing surgical anaesthesia in patients with a functioning epidural catheter for labour who require emergency Caesarean section.
-
In order to evaluate the possible role of the cuffed oropharyngeal airway during cardiopulmonary resuscitation, we compared its use by non-anaesthetists with the bag-valve-facemask technique of providing ventilation. A group of anaesthetic nurses and operating department practitioners were asked to manually ventilate the lungs of 40 patients undergoing elective surgery following the induction of general anaesthesia with neuromuscular blockade. Ventilation was first attempted using the bag-valve-facemask technique and then using the appropriate size cuffed oropharyngeal airway and self-inflating bag. ⋯ Measured expired tidal volumes were greater using the cuffed oropharyngeal airway than with bag-valve-facemask ventilation in two-thirds of patients, despite a higher incidence of audible air leak. Successful ventilation was achieved using the cuffed oropharyngeal airway in seven of the eight patients in whom bag-valve-facemask ventilation was inadequate. The cuffed oropharyngeal airway may offer an effective method of providing ventilation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation by non-anaesthetic hospital staff, particularly when attempted ventilation using a bag-valve-facemask technique is proving ineffective.
-
Comparative Study
Point-of-care testing apparatus. Measurement of coagulation.
Point-of-care testing of coagulation parameters provides a more rapid assessment of test results compared with laboratory testing. A new coagulation monitor (GEM PCL, Instrumentation Laboratory, Kirchheim, Germany) was evaluated. Point-of-care data for activated partial thromboplastin time and prothrombin time (expressed as the international normalised ratio) and turn-around-time were compared. ⋯ The point-of-care and laboratory test results showed a bias (SD) of -0.26 (4.55) s for activated partial thromboplastin time and -0.011 (0.150) s for prothrombin time. The average turn-around-time was 3 min for point-of-care testing vs. 52 min for laboratory testing. We conclude that the reliability of point-of-care testing is sufficient for clinical use.
-
Case Reports
False-positive epidural catheter aspiration tests in needle through needle combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia.
We describe two separate episodes of free aspiration of clear fluid through epidural catheters during needle-through-needle combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia in the lateral position. Although both catheters were assumed to have been located intrathecally, both subsequently gave negative test doses and were used as epidural catheters. In the second patient, the position of the catheter was investigated using contrast spiral computerised tomography scanning, which showed epidural contrast spread only. This is the first time such an occurrence has been recognised, and we consider its significance for catheter site confirmation testing in combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia.