Anaesthesia
-
The effects of the combination of a 'lowest' lung ventilation with extracorporeal elimination of carbon dioxide by interventional lung assist are described in a patient presenting with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome due to fulminant pneumonia. Reducing tidal volume to 3 ml.kg(-1) together with interventional lung assist resulted in a decrease in severe hypercapnia without alveolar collapse or hypoxaemia but with a decrease in serum levels of interleukin-6. This approach was applied for 12 days with recovery of the patient, without complications. Extracorporeal removal of carbon dioxide by interventional lung assist may be a useful tool to enable 'ultraprotective' ventilation in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
The impact of trained assistance on error rates in anaesthesia: a simulation-based randomised controlled trial.
Trained assistance for the anaesthetist appears likely to improve safety in anaesthesia. However, there are few objective data to support this assumption, and the requirement for a trained assistant is not universally enforced. We applied a simulation-based model developed in previous work to test the hypothesis that the presence of a trained assistant reduces error in anaesthesia. ⋯ The mean (SD) error rate per scenario was 4.75 (2.9). There were significantly fewer errors in the technician group than the nurse group (33 vs 62, p = 0.01) and this difference remained significant when errors were weighted for severity. This provides objective evidence supporting the requirement for trained assistance to the anaesthetist, and furthermore, demonstrates that a simulation-based model can provide rigorous evidence on safety interventions in anaesthesia.
-
Threshold systolic arterial pressure alarms often use pre-operative values as a guide for intra-operative values. Recently, two systems (normalisation and principal component analysis) have been described that use the 'current' systolic arterial pressure and the change in systolic arterial pressure over a preceding time interval to generate an alarm based on units of standard deviation. ⋯ Systolic blood pressure data, collected from 10 patients (a total of 2177 min at 100 Hz), were cleaned and submitted to analysis using threshold alarms, normalisation and principal component analysis. With the threshold alarms set at 100 mmHg (low) and 140 mmHg (high), and a 5-min window, the alarms were activated for 557 min; using statistics-based thresholds the alarms were activated for 169 min (normalisation) and 155 min (principal component analysis), a reduction of approximately 70-72%.
-
Comparative Study
The TEG vs the ROTEM thromboelastography/thromboelastometry systems.
We have evaluated the TEG thromboelastograph and the ROTEM thromboelastometer, two point-of-care devices that measure blood coagulation. During a one-week period, seven consultant anaesthetists, one consultant haematologist, one associate specialist anaesthetist and two senior trainee anaesthetists were trained by the manufacturers and set up, calibrated and used both systems, after which their views were obtained and specific technical/support information was sought from the manufacturers using a questionnaire. Although the devices shared common features, they differed in complexity and aspects of ease of use, and in their purchase and running costs.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study
Ondansetron has similar clinical efficacy against both nausea and vomiting.
Ondansetron is widely believed to prevent postoperative vomiting more effectively than nausea. We analysed data from 5161 patients undergoing general anaesthesia who were randomly stratified to receive a combination of six interventions, one of which was 4 mg ondansetron vs placebo. For the purpose of this study a 20% difference in the relative risks for the two outcomes was considered clinically relevant. ⋯ Vomiting was reduced from 17% (441/2585) to 11% (293/2576), corresponding to a relative risk of 0.67, or a relative risk reduction of 33%. The relative risks of 0.67 and 0.74 were clinically similar and the difference between them did not reach statistical significance. We thus conclude that ondansetron prevents postoperative nausea and postoperative vomiting equally well.