Anaesthesia
-
Review Meta Analysis Comparative Study
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the i-gel(®) vs laryngeal mask airway in adults.
We systematically reviewed 31 adult randomised clinical trials of the i-gel(®) vs laryngeal mask airway. The mean (95% CI) leak pressure difference and relative risk (95% CI) of insertion on the first attempt were similar: 0.40 (-1.23 to 2.02) cmH2 O and 0.98 (0.95-1.01), respectively. The mean (95% CI) insertion time and the relative risk (95% CI) of sore throat were less with the i-gel: by 1.46 (0.33-2.60) s, p = 0.01, and 0.59 (0.38-0.90), p = 0.02, respectively. ⋯ All outcomes displayed substantial heterogeneity, I(2) ≥ 75%. Subgroup analyses did not decrease heterogeneity, but suggested that insertion of the i-gel was faster than for first-generation laryngeal mask airways and that the i-gel leak pressure was higher than first generation, but lower than second-generation, laryngeal mask airways. A less frequent sore throat was the main clinical advantage of the i-gel.
-
This study aimed to gauge the opinions of patients' next of kin regarding transfer of patients from the specialist 'Hub' intensive care unit, to 'Spoke' intensive care units near home. We included 213 consecutive patients with severe trauma or severe acute neurological conditions admitted to the Hub intensive care unit over a 21-month period, who were repatriated to Spoke intensive care units for ongoing intensive care. ⋯ The next of kin's preference was associated with severe acute neurological conditions (p ≤ 0.0001). Although centralised Hub & Spoke intensive care unit networks are appropriate to ensure specialised care, repatriation to local hospitals may not be appropriate for patients with severe neurological conditions.