Anaesthesia
-
Recommendations from the guidelines:
- Hypotension following spinal or combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia at caesarean section causes both maternal and fetal/neonatal adverse effects.
- Hypotension is frequent – vasopressors should be used routinely and preferably prophylactically.
- α‐agonist drugs are the most appropriate agents to treat or prevent hypotension following spinal anaesthesia. Although those with a small amount of β‐agonist activity may have the best profile (noradrenaline (norepinephrine), metaraminol), phenylephrine is currently recommended due to the amount of supporting data. Single‐dilution techniques, and/or prefilled syringes should be considered.
- Left lateral uterine displacement and intravenous (i.v.) colloid pre‐loading or crystalloid coloading, should be used in addition to vasopressors.
- The aim should be to maintain systolic arterial pressure (SAP) at ≥ 90% of an accurate baseline obtained before spinal anaesthesia, and avoid a decrease to < 80% baseline. We recommend a variable rate prophylactic infusion of phenylephrine using a syringe pump. This should be started at 25–50 μg.min−1 immediately after the intrathecal local anaesthetic injection, and titrated to blood pressure and pulse rate. Top‐up boluses may be required.
- Maternal heart rate can be used as a surrogate for cardiac output if the latter is not being monitored; both tachycardia and bradycardia should be avoided.
- When using an α‐agonist as the first‐line vasopressor, small doses of ephedrine are suitable to manage SAP < 90% of baseline combined with a low heart rate. For bradycardia with hypotension, an anticholinergic drug (glycopyrronium (glycopyrrolate) or atropine) may be required. Adrenaline (epinephrine) should be used for circulatory collapse.
- The use of smart pumps and double (two drug) vasopressor infusions can lead to greater cardiovascular stability than that achieved with physician‐controlled infusions.
- Women with pre‐eclampsia develop less hypotension after spinal anaesthesia than healthy women. Abrupt decreases in blood pressure are undesirable because of the potential for decreased uteroplacental blood flow. A prophylactic vasopressor infusion may not be required but, if used, should be started at a lower rate than for healthy women.
- Women with cardiac disease should be assessed on an individual basis; some conditions are best managed with phenylephrine (an arterial constrictor without positive inotropic effect), whereas others respond best to ephedrine (producing positive inotropic and chronotropic effect).
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
Maternal cardiac output response to colloid preload and vasopressor therapy during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section in patients with severe pre-eclampsia: a randomised, controlled trial.
We examined the haemodynamic effects of colloid preload, and phenylephrine and ephedrine administered for spinal hypotension, during caesarean section in 42 women with severe early onset pre-eclampsia. Twenty patients with pre-delivery spinal hypotension were randomly allocated to receive an initial dose of either 50 μg phenylephrine or 7.5 mg ephedrine; the primary outcome was percentage change in cardiac index. After a 300-ml colloid preload, mean (SD) cardiac index increased from 4.9 (1.1) to 5.6 (1.2) l.min-1 .m-2 (p < 0.01), resulting from an increase in both heart rate, from 81.3 (17.2) to 86.3 (16.5) beats.min-1 (p = 0.2), and stroke volume, from 111.8 (19.0) to 119.8 (17.9) ml (p = 0.049). ⋯ After a median [range] dose of 50 [50-150] μg phenylephrine or 15 [7.5-37.5] mg ephedrine, the percentage change in cardiac index during the measurement period of 150 s was greater, and negative, in patients receiving phenylephrine vs. ephedrine, at -12.0 (7.3)% vs. 2.6 (6.0)%, respectively (p = 0.0001). The percentage change in heart rate after vasopressor was higher in patients receiving phenylephrine, at -9.1 (3.4)% vs. 5.3 (12.6)% (p = 0.0027), as was the change in systemic vascular resistance, at 22.3 (7.5) vs. -1.9 (10.5)% (p < 0.0001). Phenylephrine effectively reverses spinal anaesthesia-induced haemodynamic changes in severe pre-eclampsia, if left ventricular systolic function is preserved.
-
In this article, we will discuss the pathophysiology of peripheral nerve injury in anaesthetic practice, including factors which increase the susceptibility of nerves to damage. We will describe a practical and evidence-based approach to the management of suspected peripheral nerve injury and will go on to discuss major nerve injury patterns relating to intra-operative positioning and to peripheral nerve blockade. We will review the evidence surrounding particular strategies to reduce the incidence of peripheral nerve injury during nerve blockade, including nerve localisation methods, timing of blocks, needle techniques and design, injection pressure-monitoring and local anaesthetic and adjunct choice.
-
'Obstetric anaesthesia is a litigious area of medical practice - patient expectations are high, and many of the interventions undertaken by anaesthetists are performed urgently or emergently, frequently out of hours. The complications that occur during obstetric practice are not unique to this area of anaesthesia, but some of the physiological and anatomical changes that take place during pregnancy can affect the frequency with which these happen. In this narrative review, we hope to cover a few of the more common complications in obstetric anaesthesia, as well as some of the more severe, yet less frequently occurring problems.
-
Volatile anaesthetic agents are a potential occupational health hazard to theatre and recovery staff. Operating theatres and anaesthetic rooms are required to be equipped with scavenging systems, but recovery units often are not. We compared exhaled, spectrophotometric sevoflurane and desflurane concentrations 15 cm from the mouth ('patient breathing zone') and 91 cm laterally to the patient ('nurse work zone') in 120 patients after tracheal extubation who were consecutively allocated to either ISO-Gard mask oxygen/scavenging or standard oxygen mask, 0 min, 10 min and 20 min after arrival in the theatre recovery unit. ⋯ Using the ISO-Gard mask, the 20-min mean patient breathing zone and nurse work zone exhaled anaesthetic levels were ~ 90% and 78% lower than those recorded in the control group, respectively, and were within the recommended 2 ppm maximum environmental exposure limit in the patient breathing zone of 53 out of 60 (88%) and the nurse work zone of all 60 (100%) patients on first measurement in the recovery room (vs. 10 out of 60 (17%) and 40 out of 60 (67%) in the control group). Our study indicates that the ISO-Gard oxygen/scavenging mask reduces the level of exhaled sevoflurane and desflurane below recommended maximum exposure limits near > 85% of extubated patients within ~ 20 s of application in the recovery unit after surgery. We encourage the use of this mask to minimise the occupational exposure of recovery staff to exhaled volatile agents.