Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study
Mechanism and prevention of facial pressure injuries: A novel emergent strategy supported by a multicenter controlled study in frontline healthcare professionals fighting COVID-19.
Numerous healthcare professionals fighting COVID-19 worldwide are suffering from the protective respirators related facial pressure injuries. This study explored the mechanism and prevention of such injuries and devised a novel emergent strategy, which was supported by a multicenter self-controlled study in 1161 frontline healthcare professionals. In this study, according to the anatomy of the face and the characteristics of facial pressure injuries, a respirator liner was designed using a polyurethane foam to redistribute the pressure across the face. ⋯ The questionnaire investigation showed that pain score, wearing disturbance, and the incidence of pressure injury in the healthcare professionals were significantly correlated with wearing time (all ρ = 0.986). The new strategy significantly reduced the incidence of pressure injury from 84.7% to 11.1%, pain score IQR from 5 (2) to 1 (2), and wearing disturbance rate from 91.6% to 6.3%, and the results analyzed according to individual hospitals or different wearing time showed similar trends (all P < .0005). The protective respirators related facial pressure injuries can be effectively mitigated with this emergent strategy, which has also been applied in some European hospitals and can be popularized to help more healthcare professionals who are combating COVID-19 on the frontlines.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
Prophylactic dressings in the prevention of pressure ulcer related to the use of personal protective equipment by health professionals facing the COVID-19 pandemic: A randomized clinical trial.
Device-related pressure injury (DRPI) is a serious problem that is affecting professionals working on the front lines against COVID-19 due to the prolonged use of personal protective equipment (PPE). In addition to the physical and psychological integrity of professionals, these injuries can compromise the quality of care. Therefore, using technologies to prevent this adverse effect is an urgent matter. ⋯ There was no difference between the groups regarding skin conditions and discomfort (P > .05). The average cost obtained was $ 5.8/person and $ 4.4/person in the foam group and the hydrocolloid group, respectively, considering the dressing measurements. The results show that foam and extra-thin hydrocolloid were effective in preventing DRPI associated with the use of PPE.