Der Anaesthesist
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
[Intravenous sedation of spontaneously breathing infants and small children before magnetic resonance tomography. A comparison of propofol and methohexital].
The purpose of the present study was to compare two sedation regimens with either propofol (P) or methohexital (M) for elective magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in children with respect to safety, side effects, recovery, and discharge time. ⋯ Intravenous sedation with M or P using the reported technique is a safe regimen for children undergoing elective MRI. The fast recovery and discharge times seem to offer advantages over general anaesthesia with endotracheal intubation. The faster recovery and discharge of only a few minutes after P compared with M is without clinical relevance.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
[Comparison of sufentanil-propofol-anesthesia with fentanyl-propofol in major abdominal surgery].
Major abdominal surgery often leads to a marked sympathoadrenal stress response with high concentrations of plasma catecholomines, hypertension, and tachycardia. We compared the effects of sufentanil-propofol with fentanyl-propofol anaesthesia in a controlled, randomised, double-blind study of 18 ASA I-II patients aged 23-64 years undergoing major abdominal surgery. Study parameters were haemodynamics (heart rate [HR], arterial [ABP], central venous, and pulmonary arterial pressures, cardiac index [CI]), arterial catecholamine concentrations, and the median frequency of the electroencephalogram (EEG) power spectrum. ⋯ With both regimens, the sympathoadrenal stress response to major abdominal surgery was nearly completely suppressed, resulting in stable haemodynamics during the operations. Sufentanil and fentanyl were equally well suited as analgesic components of total i.v. anaesthesia with propofol.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Clinical Trial
[Nosocomial infections intensive care units. A nation-wide prevalence study].
In a large, multicenter survey in 1994, the prevalence of nosocomial infections in German hospitals was examined, predominant pathogens were identified, and possible risk factors evaluated. In this paper the results from the intensive care units (ICUs) are presented. ⋯ Nosocomial infections are seen far more often in ICUs than on normal wards due to the immuno-suppressed state of many ICU patients and the continuous use of invasive diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Most of these infections are of endogenous origin. Other prevalence surveys have shown results comparable to ours. Daily changing of ventilation tubes is no longer necessary, but is still routine in many hospitals. Infusion sets were also changed more often than required. The use of selective decontamination of the digestive tract for the prevention of pneumonia is still controversial; in our study it was practised in only 1.5% of the cases. The most commonly used drugs for the prevention of stress ulcers were H2-receptor blocking agents, although it has been shown that sucralfate is the better choice, as it can help prevent nosocomial pneumonia. Routine microbiological surveillance of tracheal aspirates and urine was done in 25.9% and 24.6% of the ICUs. No study so far has shown that routine cultures of tracheal secretions and urine have a preventive effect regarding infection.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
[RO 48-6791--a short acting benzodiazepine. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in young and old subjects in comparison to midazolam].
The objectives of the present study were to compare in a randomized double-blind crossover study design the concentration-effect relationships of Ro 48-6791, a new benzodiazepine agonist, and midazolam, following infusion in young and elderly male volunteers. Therefore, linearly increasing plasma concentrations were generated by computer controlled infusion pumps to achieve a deep hypnotic effect. The endpoint of the infusion was defined by loss of response to loud verbal commands and a median frequency of the recorded EEG power spectrum below 4 Hz. ⋯ The major advantages of Ro 48-6791 compared to midazolam were its shorter duration of action as well as the faster recovery and thus the better controllability. Further investigations would have to confirm these results in a greater number of patients. The applied method of pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling not only allowed to quantify the efficacy of Ro 48-6791 but also provided data to augment the safety for further investigations.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
[Thromboembolism prevention with low dose heparin and spinal anesthesia--a risky combination?].
Spinal or intracranial haematoma is a rare but severe complication of spinal/epidural anaesthesia with an incidence of less than 1:100,000. Coagulation defects, traumatic puncture, and anticoagulant drugs are assumed to be risk factors for the development of this kind of haematoma. Whether the risk of bleeding after spinal/epidural anaesthesia is increased by the administration of low-dose heparin (unfractionated or fractionated) for thromboprophylaxis is currently under discussion. ⋯ We suggest that the development of spinal or intracranial haematoma after spinal/epidural anaesthesia is a multifactorial event. An influence of low-dose heparin prophylaxis as a cofactor cannot wholly be excluded because of the difficulty of studying the problem in a prospective way. The few case reports have to be seen in the context of millions of patients who have received either unfractionated or LMW heparin and lumbar or thoracic regional anaesthesia without any complication. We conclude that low-dose heparin prophylaxis (fractionated or unfractionated) is not a definite contraindication to spinal/epidural anaesthesia. High-risk (ASA III/IV) patients in particular benefit from effective postoperative analgesia achieved by local anaesthetics in combination with effective heparin thromboprophylaxis. Nevertheless, the absolute contraindications for regional anaesthesia must be respected and an individual risk/benefit analysis should be performed for every patient. An adequate time interval between application of heparin and regional anaesthesia or removal of a spinal/epidural catheter, atraumatic puncture technique, and careful neurologic monitoring during the post-operative period can minimise the risk of complications.