Der Anaesthesist
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
[Propofol and postoperative nausea and/or vomiting].
The objective of this prospective, randomised study was to investigate the incidence of postoperative nausea and/or vomiting (PONV) during the first 24 h postoperatively. For a quality assurance study on PONV, we compared two established general anaesthetic procedures in 239 patients undergoing four different types of surgery (subtotal thyroidectomy, laparotomy for gynaecological procedures, laparoscopy, and surgery for extra-abdominal procedures). ⋯ We found that the antiemetic effect of propofol was considerable in the early postoperative period. The higher cost of propofol as compared to other induction agents can be covered by not using nitrous oxide for maintenance of anaesthesia and by the decreased need for antiemetic drugs postoperatively. According to the calculations of our clinical pharmacy, the costs of the propofol infusion regimen exceeded those of balanced anaesthesia by 8.50 DM/h; the need for antiemetics was one-half that of the non-propofol group. Considering a cost of 16 DM for cleaning the bed after vomiting, improvement of the patient's condition during the postoperative period can be achieved without additional expense.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
[Intravenous versus thoracic-epidural patient-controlled analgesia following extended abdominal or thoracic surgery].
Intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA-i.v.) has has markedly improved postoperative pain-relief. Alternatively, peridural anesthesia has been used successfully in high risk patients with the disadvantage of a more intense postoperative care. In this study we compared the applicability of intravenous vs. peridural patient-controlled analgesia on a general ward. ⋯ This study demonstrates that epidural PCA can be used on a general surgical ward as an alternative method compared to intravenous PCA. PCA-PDK may be advantageous over intravenous PCA since both techniques require similar intense monitoring and side effects in the PCA-PDK group appear to be less.
-
Effects of anaesthesia and analgesia on postoperative morbidity and mortality remain controversial. Numerous studies have demonstrated that epidural anaesthesia and pain relief by epidural analgesia reduces perioperative stress responses and thus may reduce postoperative morbidity and mortality. In patients undergoing vascular surgery, epidural anaesthesia diminished postoperative hypercoagulability. ⋯ One reason for this disappointing finding may be the missing integration of improved postoperative pain relief into general surgical care. A multimodal therapeutic approach, which consists of preoperative patient information, sufficient analgesia, early mobilisation and enteral feeding, may solve this discrepancy. Therefore, prospective controlled studies are needed to assess the influence of this perioperative approach on outcome.
-
Thoracic epidural anaesthesia (TEA) faces growing interest as an adjuvant anaesthetic and postoperative analgesic regimen. The procedure allows a specific blockade of nociceptive reflex arches and may exert beneficial effects on stress-induced alterations of organ function. Myocardial blood flow to areas at risk is improved, and paradoxical reactions of atherosclerotic coronary arteries after sympathetic stimulation are suppressed. ⋯ Although lumbar epidural anaesthesia is preferred by many anaesthesiologists as there is no risk of traumatizing the spinal cord, many positive effects are forgone. With insufficient rostral spread of a lumbar epidural block above the fifth thoracic level, cardiac complications can occur due to reflex activation of sympathetic outflow in unblocked thoracic regions. When the contraindications are carefully observed, TEA can be safely performed in most patients.
-
Although the need for the implementation of a quality management concept for the German emergency medical system (EMS) has been discussed for more than 10 years, such a concept has not been realised on a broad scale. Standardised national data sheets were developed many years ago. They are used by many local agencies, but a data-gathering system on a state or national basis is still lacking. ⋯ Quality control works on the basis that all EMS team members are motivated to perform on a professional level to ensure that each patient is treated adequately. It evaluates the system to create circumstances that enhance the achievement of this goal. Quality management is not only concerned with mishaps, because areas with documented good performance also provide important information.