Der Anaesthesist
-
A variety of influences reduce the validity of the measured oxygen partial pressure (paO(2)). Most errors occur when obtaining the blood sample and preparing it for analysis. Unfortunately, there is great controversy concerning the relevance and extent of these pre-analytic errors. Apart from this, the exact estimation of influencing factors under hyperoxic conditions has been neglected. Therefore, the objective of this study was to assess pre-analytic measuring errors for paO(2) under the condition of hyperoxia as completely as possible and to work out solutions to eliminate these errors. ⋯ All pre-analytic errors investigated caused a significant paO(2) decrease. Even an ideal procedure (almost no air bubble, short storage on ice) contributes a significant error. Only the appropriate correction factors as calculated from this study for routine use lead to the correct results. If they are not taken into account the paO(2) values will be falsely low, potentially leading to misinterpretation and misjudgement of a patient's condition.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
[Accuracy and dose dependency of the train-of-four count].
The estimation of a nondepolarizing neuromuscular block using the train-of-four (TOF) count shows wide differences compared to the mechanomyographic measurement. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical significance of these differences. ⋯ At reappearance of T4, a recovery of neuromuscular block of 25% is missed only by 3 to 5 min during relaxation with atracurium. We consider this margin of error as unimportant for clinical use. More-over we were able to show that the TOF-count is not dose dependent.