Der Anaesthesist
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
[Topographic-quantitative EEG-analysis of the paradoxical arousal reaction. EEG changes during urologic surgery using isoflurane/ N2O anesthesia].
Increases in slow-wave (delta) activity in the EEG may reflect increased depth of anaesthesia provided that hypoxia, haemodynamic instability and drug overdose have been excluded. In contrast, similar intraoperative EEG responses have been described as paradoxical arousal reactions. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of surgical stimulation on spatial EEG changes during anaesthesia with 0.6% isoflurane/66% nitrous oxide. ⋯ Since these events occur predominantly at frontal areas they may not be detected with single-channel parietal recordings. Our data suggest that topographical EEG monitoring may useful for assessing painful events during surgery. Using EEG monoparameters like spectral edge frequency or median the occurrence of paradoxical arousal reactions may be falsely interpreted as an increased depth of anaesthesia.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
[Quality of induction and adrenocortical function. A clinical comparison of Etomidate-Lipuro and Hypnomidate].
The purpose of this study was to compare etomidate in a lipid emulsion (Etomidat-Lipuro; Braun, Melsungen) and in propylene glycol (Hypnomidate, Janssen Pharmaceutica) in 90 patients in terms of anaesthetic induction characteristics with special reference to injection side effects, haemodynamic changes, and quality of induction. Adrenocortical hormones were determined in 30 patients who received either Etomidat-Lipuro, Hypnomidate, or propofol (Diprivan, ICI Pharma) for induction of anaesthesia. ⋯ Local side effects are minimal after the administration of Etomidat-Lipuro and Hypnomidate. Alfentanil reduces the injection pain of etomidate induction agents. Cortisol and aldosterone are depressed by etomidate, but the clinical relevance is minimal after a single bolus injection.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
[Pediatric surgery. A comparison of spinal anesthesia and general anesthesia].
Forty patients aged 2 to 5 years who were admitted for paediatric operations were randomly assigned to have either spinal or general anaesthesia. Spinal anaesthesia was achieved with isobaric bupivacaine 0.5% at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg. General anaesthesia was induced with thiopentone 2-5 mg/kg and continued with low-dose fentanyl (1-2 micrograms/kg, oxygen/nitrous oxide/isoflurane (30/70/0.1-0.5%), vecuronium normoventilating the patients. ⋯ Vomiting (2), sore throat (4) and micturition difficulties (2) were the adverse events associated with general anaesthesia. Three patients were restless after spinal anaesthesia. It can be concluded that spinal anaesthesia is a suitable anaesthetic technique for paediatric surgery.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
[Hemodynamics of coronary surgery patients following magnesium aspartate infusion].
Hypertension is a common phenomenon in patients undergoing aortocoronary bypass grafting. This hypertension increases myocardial oxygen consumption and can be prevented by application of vasodilators. A possible cause is activation of the renin angiotensin system. ⋯ Due to its vasodilating effect, magnesium lowers the output impedance of the left ventricle and improves cardiac pumping function. It opposes detrimental cardiovascular responses to sternotomy and following aortic cannulation. Also of importance is the advantageous effect of magnesium on cardiac arrest elicited by cardioplegia and for reactivation of the ischaemic myocardium.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
[Intrathecal morphine for postoperative pain].
At the beginning, the way intrathecal morphine was used for postoperative pain relief was quite unfortunate, because the doses derived from experience with morphine-tolerant cancer patients were considerably too high and respiratory depression occurred frequently. Subsequent dose-finding studies showed that the doses of morphine used initially could be reduced by a factor of ten without loss of the analgesic effect and with a marked reduction in side-effects. No respiratory depression has been reported when doses below 0.1 mg morphine are used. ⋯ This technique is safe, simple, reliable and virtually free of side-effects. No particular supervision due to the administration of intrathecal morphine is necessary in this dose range if systemic opiates are avoided. If the analgesia is unsatisfactory, a non-opioid analgesic is recommended.