Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
-
To quantify the frequency, cost, and characteristics associated with emergency department (ED) visits that are related to methamphetamine use. ⋯ Methamphetamine abuse accounts for a modest but substantial proportion of ED utilization and hospital cost. Methamphetamine-related ED visits are most commonly related to mental illness, trauma, skin, and dental-related problems.
-
Emergency medicine research requires the enrollment of subjects with varying decision-making capacities, including capable adults, adults incapacitated by illness or injury, and children. These different categories of subjects are protected by multiple federal regulations. These include the federal Common Rule, the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) regulations for pediatric research, and the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) Final Rule for the Exception from the Requirements of Informed Consent in Emergency Situations. ⋯ This article is intended as a guide for emergency researchers and IRB members who review emergency research. It reviews the elements of Federal Regulations that apply to consent, subject selection, privacy protection, and the analysis of risks and benefits in all emergency research. It explores the challenges for IRB review listed above, and offers potential solutions to these problems.
-
Comparative Study
Differences in long-term mortality for different emergency department presenting complaints.
To characterize long-term mortality based on previous emergency department (ED) presenting complaints. ⋯ Long-term age- and gender-adjusted mortality is the highest with seizures out of 33 presenting complaints and differs markedly between different ED admission complaints. Furthermore, depending on the admission complaint, long-term mortality differs within the same discharge diagnosis. Hence, the presenting complaint adds unique information to the discharge diagnosis regarding long-term mortality in nonsurgical patients.
-
Comparative Study
A cost-effectiveness analysis of propofol versus midazolam for procedural sedation in the emergency department.
To determine the incremental cost-effectiveness of using propofol versus midazolam for procedural sedation (PS) in adults in the emergency department (ED). ⋯ These results indicate that using propofol for PS in the ED is a cost-saving strategy.
-
Review Comparative Study
Safety and clinical effectiveness of midazolam versus propofol for procedural sedation in the emergency department: a systematic review.
To synthesize the evidence comparing the adverse event (AE) profile and clinical effectiveness of midazolam and propofol for procedural sedation (PS) in adults in the emergency care setting. ⋯ The authors found no significant difference in the safety profile and the proportion of successful PS between midazolam and propofol for adults in the ED.