Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
-
Multicenter Study
Process quality indicators targeting cognitive impairment to support quality of care for older people with cognitive impairment in emergency departments.
The objective of this study was to develop process quality indicators (PQIs) to support the improvement of care services for older people with cognitive impairment in emergency departments (ED). ⋯ This article presents a set of PQIs for the evaluation of the care for older people with cognitive impairment in EDs. The variation in indicator triggering across different ED sites suggests that there are opportunities for quality improvement in care for this vulnerable group. Applied PQIs will identify an emergency services' implementation of care strategies for cognitively impaired older ED patients. Awareness of the PQI triggers at an ED level enables implementation of targeted interventions to improve any suboptimal processes of care. Further validation and utility of the indicators in a wider population is now indicated.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study
The Association of Health Status and Providing Consent to Continued Participation in an Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest Trial Performed Under Exception From Informed Consent.
Emergency medical research performed under federal regulation 21 § CFR 50.24 provides a means to protect human subjects and investigate novel time-sensitive treatments. Although prospective individual consent is not required for studies conducted under this regulation, consent from a legally authorized representative (LAR) or the patient at the earliest feasible opportunity is required to obtain short- and long-term outcome data. The objective of this study was to determine which demographic, cardiac arrest, and patient outcome characteristics predicted the likelihood of obtaining informed consent following enrollment under exception from informed consent in a multicenter cardiac arrest study. ⋯ Initial arrest rhythm and survival with good neurologic outcome were highly predictive of obtaining consent in this cardiac arrest trial. This phenomenon could result in underrepresentation of outcome data in the study arm with the worse outcome and represents a significant potential confounder in studies performed under 21 § CFR 50.24. Future revisions to the exception from informed consent regulations should allow access to critical survival data recorded as part of standard documentation, regardless of patient consent status.