Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
-
Opioids are commonly administered in the emergency department (ED) and prescribed for the treatment of back pain. It is important to understand the unintended consequences of this approach to inform treatment decisions and the consideration of alternative treatments. Recent evidence has shown that ED opioid prescriptions are associated with future opioid use. The objective of this study was to measure the association of opioid administration in the ED to patients treated for back pain with future opioid use. ⋯ For opioid-naïve patients with back pain, both administration of an opioid in the ED and opioid prescriptions are associated with a doubling of the risk of ongoing opioid use compared to patients not treated with opioids. This supports the consideration of minimizing exposure to opioids while treating back pain in the ED.
-
Methamphetamine intoxication is an increasing cause of emergency department (ED) visits in the United States, particularly in the west. In San Francisco, California, 47% of patients visiting psychiatric emergency services are intoxicated with methamphetamine. Such patients often visit the ED due to acute psychiatric symptoms, yet ED-based research investigating the outcomes and resource utilization of these visits is limited. ⋯ Methamphetamine ED visits were associated with increased odds of needing chemical restraint and of an increased ED LOS but not with psychiatric inpatient admission. These results indicate an opportunity to improve the efficiency of ED care for these patients.
-
We examined emergency department (ED) advanced practice provider (APP) productivity and how APP staffing impacted ED productivity, safety, flow, and experience. ⋯ In this group, APPs treated less complex visits and half as many patients/hour compared to physicians. Higher APP coverage allowed physicians to treat higher-acuity cases. We found no economies of scale for APP coverage, suggesting that increasing APP staffing may not lower staffing costs. However, there were also no adverse observed effects of APP coverage on ED flow, clinical safety, or patient experience, suggesting little risk of increased APP coverage on clinical care delivery.