Journal of the American College of Surgeons
-
Surgical analyses often focus on single or binary outcomes; we developed an ordinal Desirability of Outcome Ranking (DOOR) for surgery to increase granularity and sensitivity of surgical outcome assessments. Many studies also combine elective and urgent procedures for risk adjustment. We used DOOR to examine complex associations of race/ethnicity and presentation acuity. ⋯ NSQIP surgical DOOR is a new method to assess outcomes and reveals a complex interplay between race/ethnicity and presentation acuity. Combining elective and urgent cases in risk adjustment may penalize hospitals serving a higher proportion of minority populations. DOOR can be used to improve detection of health disparities and serves as a roadmap for the development of other ordinal surgical outcomes measures. Improving surgical outcomes should focus on decreasing preoperative acute serious conditions and urgent and emergent surgeries, possibly by improving access to care, especially for minority populations.
-
Observational Study
Liver Transplantation vs Partial Hepatectomy for Stage T2 Multifocal Hepatocellular Carcinoma <3 cm without Vascular Invasion: A Propensity-Score Matched Survival Analysis.
Multifocal hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) differs biologically and immunologically from single-nodule HCC. Asian and European guidelines consider liver transplantation (LT) and partial hepatectomy (PH) as effective for T2 multifocal HCC, with preference toward LT, but few US studies compare these treatments directly. This propensity score-based observational study uses an established national cancer outcomes registry to compare overall survival in patients undergoing PH and LT for multifocal HCC. ⋯ Although early-stage HCC can be effectively treated with either LT or PH, propensity score-matched analysis comparatively shows a survival benefit for LT in patients with multifocal HCC who are within the Milan criteria.
-
Patient-reported outcomes in clinical research allow for a more comprehensive and meaningful assessment of interventions but are subjective and difficult to interpret. European Registry for Abdominal Wall Hernias-Quality of Life (EuraHS-QoL) is a tool designed to assess perioperative quality of life for patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair, one of the most performed operations worldwide. Defining the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) for EuraHS-QoL tool can help standardize its interpretation for research purposes and facilitate improved shared decision making in clinical settings. ⋯ In this study, we define overall and domain-specific MCIDs for the EuraHS-QoL instrument using statistical methods, patient-based methods, and clinical expertise, providing estimates that are both statistically and clinically significant.
-
Pancreaticobiliary (PB) cancers are a diverse group of cancers with poor prognoses and high rates of recurrence after resection. Patient-derived xenografts (PDX), created from surgical specimens, provide a reliable preclinical research platform and high-fidelity cancer model from which to study these malignancies with consistent recapitulation of their original patient tumors in vivo. However, the relationship between PDX engraftment success (growth or no growth) and patient oncologic outcomes has not been well studied. We sought to evaluate the correlation between successful PDX engraftment and survival in several PB exocrine carcinomas, including the pancreatic and biliary tract. ⋯ Successful PB cancer PDX models predict recurrence and survival across tumor types and may provide critical lead time to alter patients' surveillance or treatment plans before cancer recurrence.