European journal of emergency medicine : official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine
-
Previous studies on prehospital care are mostly hampered by a large number of less-urgent missions and lack of utilization of the possibilities which blur the effect of an advanced medical service. The current analysis of the most aggressive trauma care on-scene concludes that largely all vital stabilization can be carried out prehospitally, except performing an X-ray (with its possible consequences) and an operation. ⋯ In this development, the principles in prehospital care often exceeds what is actually offered in the hospitals' emergency rooms. Since the majority of advanced prehospital methods depends on comparatively safe anaesthesia and analgesia techniques, the particular responsibility for anaesthetists in this field is stressed.
-
Management of the trapped casualty is a specialized area of prehospital care. It requires close cooperation between all the emergency services. ⋯ A variety of immobilization equipment is available, different equipment being suitable to different situations. The prehospital anaesthetist needs to understand the influence this equipment has on airway management and subsequent anaesthesia.
-
There is substantial evidence that with better investment of human and capital resources, better evacuation procedures, and more timely delivery of trauma victims to trauma centres, that mortality and morbidity from trauma will be reduced. The integration of these advances in care, as well as the need to avoid mistakes, requires sound decisions. Thankfully, a clear consensus of the priorities in assessment and intervention is available to guide caregivers as they make these decisions. Repeated examination of the patient and concerted use of these priorities, together with data collection to monitor their use will benefit patients.
-
Setting standards and implementing quality improvement in trauma care needs consideration of the definitions of standards, guidelines, recommendations and the present quality of trauma care. Essential factors for consideration are the chain of survival and different intervals which may decide on patient outcome: (a) the trauma (occurrence) to trauma recognition interval which has, until now, not been taken into consideration with regard to morbidity and mortality; (b) the scene time is part of the total prehospital time which comprises rescuing the entrapped patient, preparation of the patient for treatment, and transfer to a rescue vehicle. The medical part of the scene time, however, represents only 25% of the total scene time and an even lower percentage of the total prehospital time. ⋯ This is the case for fluid administration, endotracheal intubation, etc. Furthermore, the qualification of the different personnel responding to trauma alert needs to be taken into consideration as well as the quality of care provided by the individual hospitals. The following conclusions may thus be drawn: that, currently there is no scientifically proven standard or care for trauma patients; the role of trauma care standards in the reduction of mortality and morbidity has not yet been identified; implementing incorrect standards may lead to entirely inappropriate conclusions; and that it is essential to perform scientific investigations of the outlined factors in order to establish future standards of trauma care.
-
For optimal treatment of burns an understanding of the pathophysiological changes occurring locally and systemically after injury is necessary. Accurate estimation of burn size and depth as well as early treatment is essential. Knowledge of the circumstances of the accident and experience in diagnosing physical signs are required in terms of the need for intubation, treatment of poisoning and the occurrence of other trauma.