European journal of emergency medicine : official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study
Stethoscope versus point-of-care ultrasound in the differential diagnosis of dyspnea: a randomized trial.
We aimed to determine the accuracies of point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS) and stethoscopes as part of the physical examinations of patients with dyspnea. Three emergency medicine specialists in each of two groups of ultrasound and stethoscope performers underwent didactic and hands-on training on PoCUS and stethoscope usage. ⋯ No significant differences were observed in the utility parameters of these modalities in these diagnoses. Although some authors argue that it is time to abandon the 'archaic tools' of past centuries, we believe that it is too early to discontinue the use of the stethoscope.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
Can today's house officers teach effectively? An assessment in undergraduate emergency training.
Previous publications describe house officers (HOs) as unaware of their ineffective teaching skills. ⋯ From a learner's perspective, the quality of teaching provided by HOs was rated at least similar and mostly better overall than that provided by faculty. These findings contradict results from previous studies on the quality of HO teaching and therefore warrant further assessment.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study
Virtual reality and live simulation: a comparison between two simulation tools for assessing mass casualty triage skills.
This study tested the hypothesis that virtual reality simulation is equivalent to live simulation for testing naive medical students' abilities to perform mass casualty triage using the Simple Triage and Rapid Treatment (START) algorithm in a simulated disaster scenario and to detect the improvement in these skills after a teaching session. ⋯ Virtual reality simulation proved to be a valuable tool, equivalent to live simulation, to test medical students' abilities to perform mass casualty triage and to detect improvement in such skills.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study
Quality of resuscitation by first responders using the 'public access resuscitator': a randomized manikin study.
The CAREvent Public Access Resuscitator (PAR) is an electronic, oxygen-driven cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) device allowing volume-controlled ventilation with a face mask and guiding the rescuer through the resuscitation with voice prompts and visual indications. We hypothesized that 1 year after initial training, the efficacy of ventilation skills (primary outcome) and compression skills (secondary outcome) by first responders using the PAR would be superior compared with CPR with only a face mask. ⋯ Compared with the face mask, PAR improved tidal volume, compressions per minute and hand position in a manikin setting.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study
Emergency airway management by paramedics: comparison between standard endotracheal intubation, laryngeal mask airway, and I-gel.
The aim of this study was to investigate whether briefly trained paramedics would be able to successfully intubate by endotracheal intubation (ETI) and using the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) and the I-gel in a manikin model. After the completion of a questionnaire, a brief educational session, and presentation of ETI, LMA, and I-gel, 72 paramedics were randomly allocated to intubate an adult manikin. ⋯ In addition, the mean insertion time values were significantly affected by the accuracy of the answers to the theoretical questions (P<0.05 for all questions). Paramedics should lay greater emphasis on airway management using supraglottic devices, especially I-gel because of its shorter time of insertion.