Journal of investigative medicine : the official publication of the American Federation for Clinical Research
-
This study aimed to verify a novel potential indicator of disease progression in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients. Bone marrow samples were collected from 27 AML patients and 27 controls without hematological malignancies. Polypyrimidine tract-binding protein 1 (PTBP1) expression in bone marrow samples was measured, and the association of PTBP1 with the French-American-British (FAB) classification, cytogenetics, risk stratification, and complete remission (CR) rate was analyzed. ⋯ Moreover, PTBP1 expression was associated with a poorer prognosis according to risk stratification and a lower CR rate in AML patients. In addition, PTBP1 expression was positively correlated with the expression of the proliferation marker Ki-67 and negatively correlated with the expression of the apoptosis marker p53 in AML patients. Overall, PTBP1 is a viable biomarker that contributes to the risk prediction and the determination of potential drug targets for AML.
-
Meta Analysis Comparative Study
EXPRESS: Dual Versus Triple Antithrombotic Therapy in Atrial Fibrillation and Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Antithrombotic treatment in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and acute coronary syndrome (ACS) poses a dilemma. We compared outcomes of dual antithrombotic therapy (DAT) (direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)/warfarin + antiplatelets) vs triple antithrombotic therapy (TAT) (DOACs/warfarin, aspirin, and P2Y12 inhibitor) in this population. Multiple databases were searched from inception to December 17, 2023 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing DAT vs TAT in patients with AF and ACS. ⋯ No difference was seen in the occurrence of MACE, MI, stroke, or stent thrombosis between DAT and TAT across all three durations of TAT. This is the largest pooled analysis comparing TAT to DAT stratified by the duration of antithrombotic therapy. Our results revealed that DAT was associated with reduced bleeding risk despite no difference in other outcomes.
-
Clinical research is a key factor in healthcare progress, as it contributes toward improving our knowledge on the prevention, etiology, and treatment of different conditions. Healthcare professionals and researchers should be familiar with this specific terminology and procedures of clinical research to understand and be able to evaluate clinical trial results and make decisions using up-to-date recommendations. ⋯ Additionally, when it comes to communicating the results and publishing them, it is also necessary to know how to do it adequately to ensure transparency. This work includes a description of different concepts commonly used in clinical research, particularly in the clinical trials field, in an attempt to compile different topics by providing a brief and accessible overview.
-
Previously, many studies have reported changes in the gut microbiota of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). While CRC is a well-described disease, the relationship between its development and features of the intestinal microbiome is still being understood. ⋯ In this review we highlight various aspects of our understanding of the relationship between the development of CRC and the alteration of intestinal microbiome, focusing specifically on the role of F. nucleatum. As the amount of F. nucleatum DNA in CRC tissue is associated with shorter survival, it may potentially serve as a prognostic biomarker, and most importantly may open the door for a role in CRC treatment.
-
The World Health Organization declared the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on March 11, 2020. Since then, researchers have been investigating the efficacy and side effects of its medication, up until now. From the viewpoint of Persian medicine, some medications such as antihistamines may cause retention of secretions and lead to exacerbation and spread of the disease in the body. ⋯ Generalized estimating equations were applied to assess the relationship between the severity of COVID-19 and the use of antihistamines, taking into account potential confounding factors such as time and herbal consumption. The difference in the severity of COVID-19 disease in antihistamine users compared to nonusers was not significant in 4 weeks despite the higher baseline severity in nonusers. The comparison of two groups of antihistamine users and nonusers showed that there was a significant difference (p = 0.001) regarding the use of herbal medicines.