Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis
-
J. Thromb. Thrombolysis · Feb 2019
Comparative Study Observational StudyLow-dose compared to manufacturer-recommended dose four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate for acute warfarin reversal.
Four-factor PCC is the recommended standard of care for acute warfarin reversal but optimal dosing is unknown. We aim to show that a low-dose strategy is often adequate and may reduce the risk of thromboembolic events when compared to manufacturer-recommended dosing. ⋯ Utilization of a low-dose 4F-PCC strategy resulted in fewer patients achieving target INR reversal, but no difference in hemostatic efficacy, thromboembolic events, or survival.
-
J. Thromb. Thrombolysis · Feb 2019
Comparative StudyExploring the effect of factor Xa inhibitors on rotational thromboelastometry: a case series of bleeding patients.
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have become the standard for thromboembolic risk management. In cases of major bleeding, trauma, or urgent surgery, accurate monitoring of DOAC activity is desirable; however, there is often no rapid, readily available test. We therefore explored the degree to which DOAC activity correlated with two coagulation assays: rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) and a standard coagulation assay in bleeding patients. ⋯ Analyses were not conducted for dabigatran due to limited data. Although not statistically significant, PT appears to have a higher correlation with direct Xa inhibitor activity than EXTEM-CT. Further research with larger samples is necessary to clarify the differences between ROTEM and standard assays in detecting DOAC activity.
-
J. Thromb. Thrombolysis · Feb 2019
Comparative StudyBleeding rates of Veterans taking apixaban or rivaroxaban for atrial fibrillation or venous thromboembolism.
This study examined potential differences in bleeding between apixaban and rivaroxaban, the most commonly utilized direct oral anticoagulants at the Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center. Additionally, the analysis included a comparison between observed and literature-reported bleeding rates. ⋯ The analysis did not detect any statistically significant differences between apixaban and rivaroxaban in terms of overall, (ARR 0.90% per 100 patient-years, 95% CI - 0.58 to 2.38%, p > 0.05) major, (ARR 0.22% per 100 patient-years, 95% CI - 0.74 to 1.17%, p > 0.05) or non-major clinically relevant (ARR 0.35% per 100 patient-years, 95% CI - 0.57 to 1.27%, p > 0.05) bleeding. Observed bleeding for both rivaroxaban and apixaban in the Veteran population exceeded the rates reported by the literature when used for atrial fibrillation (1.96% vs. 0.15%, p < 0.05; 1.08% vs. 0.16%, p < 0.05) but the opposite was seen for long term venous thromboembolism (VTE) treatment (3.97% vs. 8.03%, p < 0.0001; 0.14% vs. 15.51%, p < 0.0001) or extended VTE prophylaxis (0.07% vs 5.98%, p < 0.0001; 0.07% vs 1.88%, p < 0.01). Results from this study suggest these agents impart similar levels of risk, but variations in bleeding risk between the Veteran population and the patients in the original clinical trials may exist.
-
J. Thromb. Thrombolysis · Jan 2019
Changes in treatment and outcomes after creation of a pulmonary embolism response team (PERT), a 10-year analysis.
Multidisciplinary pulmonary embolism response teams (PERTs) are being implemented to improve care of patients with life-threatening PE. We sought to determine how the creation of PERT affects treatment and outcomes of patients with serious PE. A pre- and post-intervention study was performed using an interrupted time series design, to compare patients with PE before (2006-2012) and after (2012-2016) implementation of PERT at a university hospital. ⋯ Interrupted time series analysis demonstrated that this increase was sudden and coincident with implementation of PERT, and most noticeable among patients with submassive PE. There were no differences in major bleeding or mortality pre- and post-PERT. While the use of advanced therapies, particularly catheter-directed therapies, increased after creation of PERT, especially among patients with submassive PE, there was no apparent increase in bleeding.
-
J. Thromb. Thrombolysis · Nov 2018
Review Meta Analysis Comparative StudyTenecteplase versus alteplase for management of acute ischemic stroke: a pairwise and network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
Tenecteplase is a genetically mutated variant of alteplase with superior pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties. However, its efficacy and safety in acute ischemic strokes are limited. Hence, we conducted a study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tenecteplase compared with alteplase in acute ischemic stroke. ⋯ There were no differences between the two thrombolytics in terms of excellent recovery (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] 0-1; OR 1.17; 95% CI 0.95-1.44; p = 0.13), functional independence (mRS 0-2; OR 1.24; 95% CI 0.78-1.98), poor recovery (mRS 4-6; OR 0.78; 95% CI 0.49-1.25; p = 0.31), complete/partial recanalization (OR 1.51; 95% CI 0.70-3.26; p = 0.30), any intracerebral hemorrhage (OR 0.81; 95% CI 0.56-1.17; p = 0.26), symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (OR 0.98; 95% CI 0.52-1.83; p = 0.94), or mortality (OR 0.83; 95% CI 0.54-1.26; p = 0.38). In network meta-analysis, there were better efficacy and imaging-based outcomes with tenecteplase 0.25 mg/kg without increased risk of safety outcomes. Our results demonstrate that in acute ischemic stroke, thrombolysis with tenecteplase is at least as effective and safe as alteplase.