Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis
-
J. Thromb. Thrombolysis · Nov 2020
Meta AnalysisVenous thromboembolism in critically ill COVID-19 patients receiving prophylactic or therapeutic anticoagulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Many aspects of care such as management of hypercoagulable state in COVID-19 patients, especially those admitted to intensive care units is challenging in the rapidly evolving pandemic of novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We seek to systematically review the available evidence regarding the anticoagulation approach to prevent venous thromboembolism (VTE) among COVID-19 patients admitted to intensive care units. Electronic databases were searched for studies reporting venous thromboembolic events in patients admitted to the intensive care unit receiving any type of anticoagulation (prophylactic or therapeutic). ⋯ The pooled prevalence of VTE among ICU patients receiving prophylactic or therapeutic anticoagulation across all studies was 31% (95% CI 20-43%). Subgroup pooled analysis limited to studies reported prophylactic anticoagulation alone and mixed (therapeutic and prophylactic anticoagulation) reported pooled prevalences of VTE of 38% (95% CI 10-70%) and 27% (95% CI 17-40%) respectively. With a high prevalence of thromboprophylaxis failure among COVID-19 patients admitted to intensive care units, individualised rather than protocolised VTE thromboprophylaxis would appear prudent at interim.
-
J. Thromb. Thrombolysis · Aug 2020
Review Meta AnalysisDirect oral anticoagulants more effective than low-molecular-weight heparin for venous thrombo-embolism in cancer: an updated meta-analysis of randomized trials.
In the recent past, low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) was the first choice in the treatment of cancer related venous thrombo-embolism (VTE). Evidence supporting the preferential use of direct anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with cancer, instead, is less robust so far. We therefore aimed to assess in an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials whether the use of DOACs may be associated with a more favorable profile when compared to LMWH. ⋯ DOACs patients had a lower incidence of 6-month recurrent VTE when compared to LMWHs (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.40-0.79; p < 0.001). Incidence of major bleeding was not significantly different between DOACs and LMWH treated patients (RR 1.56, 95% CI 0.95-2.47, p = n.s.), and mortality rates were comparable (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.91-2.47, p = n.s.). In a meta-analysis of RCTs therapy with DOACs was superior to LMWH in terms of efficacy and lower recurrence of VTE with a comparable safety profile in terms of bleeding events and complications.
-
J. Thromb. Thrombolysis · Aug 2020
Meta AnalysisThe efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid in the treatment of intertrochanteric fracture: an updated meta-analysis of 11 randomized controlled trials.
This meta-analysis was performed to investigate the efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid (TXA) in the elderly patients undergoing intertrochanteric fracture surgery from the current literatures. The electronic literature database of PubMed, Embase and Cochrane library were searched in October 2019. The intraoperative blood loss, hidden blood loss, postoperative drainage and total blood loss, postoperative hemoglobin, length of stay, transfusion rate, mortality rate, thromboembolic events and wound complications were extracted. ⋯ However, no significant difference was found between the TXA group and control group regarding the occurrence of thromboembolic events (P = 0.978, including deep vein thrombosis, P = 0.850; pulmonary embolism, P = 0.788; cerebrovascular accident, P = 0.549; myocardial infarction, P = 0.395) and mortality rate (P = 0. 338). Our meta-analysis suggested that administration of TXA is effective in reducing intraoperative blood loss, hidden blood loss, total blood loss, length of stay, transfusion rate, wound complications and enhancing postoperative Hb without increasing the risk of thromboembolic events and mortality rate in intertrochanteric fracture surgery. More large multi-center and high-quality RCTs are required for further research.
-
J. Thromb. Thrombolysis · Jan 2020
Meta Analysis Comparative StudyShort-term dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) followed by P2Y12 monotherapy versus traditional DAPT in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: meta-analysis and viewpoint.
The optimal duration dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is subject to debate. A short-duration DAPT (one month to three months) followed by P2Y12 monotherapy instead of standard 6 to 12 months DAPT followed by aspirin monotherapy after PCI has been suggested. We meta-analyzed studies comparing short-term (≤ 3 months) DAPT followed by P2Y12 monotherapy versus standard DAPT in patients after PCI. ⋯ The experimental treatment with P2Y12 monotherapy after very short-term DAPT was not superior to standard DAPT. Our meta-analysis adds insight that DAPT might be safely shortened in selected patient strategies. However, DAPT remains the gold standard for antithrombotic treatment after PCI.
-
J. Thromb. Thrombolysis · Oct 2019
Meta Analysis Comparative StudyEfficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants versus low-molecular-weight heparin in patients with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
The efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) are still debated in the treatment of patients with cancer, and the optimal duration of therapy remains uncertain. Electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library) were searched to retrieve studies on the efficacy and safety of DOACs versus LMWH in treating patients with cancer from January 1980 to October 2018. The primary efficacy and safety endpoints were recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) and major bleeding. ⋯ Moreover, subgroup analyses according to the treatment duration indicated that DOACs significantly reduced the incidence of recurrent VTE (P = 0.006 at 6 months; P < 0.001 at 12 months) without significant differences in major bleeding compared with LMWH at 6 or 12 months. Patients with cancer who received DOACs exhibited a significant reduction in recurrent VTE with no increased risk of major bleeding compared with LMWH. DOACs may be an alternative choice for long-term anticoagulant therapy in patients with cancer.