Current opinion in pulmonary medicine
-
Pneumonia is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States. The provision of effective prophylaxis for pneumonia has become a major goal for both public health officials and individual physicians. Prophylaxis for community-acquired pneumonia is pathogen-specific and is directed toward the most common microorganisms that cause it. ⋯ Rather, prevention of nosocomial pneumonia requires the use of infection control procedures, including patient and staff education; isolation of patients with highly contagious respiratory pathogens; vigorous hand washing; cleaning and sterilizaton of respiratory equipment; and use of sterile water in nebulizers and humidifiers. It also requires procedures to limit pooling and aspiration of secretions, such as positioning and rotation of the bed-bound patient; frequent suctioning of respiratory secretions using gloves and sterile suction catheters; and limiting enteral alimentation. Finally, selective decontamination of the digestive tract may be considered for intubated patients.
-
Parapneumonic effusions are frequent complications of bacterial pneumonia. Depending on the severity of the underlying pneumonia, the promptness of antibiotic therapy, and the virulence of the infecting organism, 5% to 50% of patients will require pleural fluid drainage to prevent progression to an empyema. The decision to drain the pleural space depends on multiple clinical, laboratory, and radiographic factors. ⋯ Image-guided percutaneous chest catheters provided an effective method for draining both free-flowing and loculated effusions. Fibrinolytic agents are gaining wider acceptance for promoting drainage of loculated, viscous pleural fluid although randomized studies do not exist. Patients failing a chest tube drainage method should undergo early evaluation for an open surgical procedure.
-
The management of respiratory infections is a complex and dynamic process, with many areas of controversy and numerous unresolved questions. In an apparent effort to deal with these issues, guidelines for care are being developed for a variety of infections including bronchitis, community-acquired pneumonia, hospital-acquired pneumonia, tuberculosis, HIV infection, and viral illness in immune-compromised patients. As the era of managed care approaches, guidelines will continue to emerge, and several questions about their utility must be answered. ⋯ Although evidence-based medicine has been suggested as a basis for this process, there are several problems with this approach. Most importantly, evidence-based medicine does not adequately allow for the incorporation of local experience, which is so vital in the management of respiratory infection because of the variability in bacteriology and antimicrobial susceptibilities in different practice settings. If a guideline is developed by a consensus of experts, and viewed as an hypothesis that can be modified based on local data collection, then it can be very useful and can lead to a number of potential benefits for patients with respiratory tract infection.