Current opinion in critical care
-
The clinical relevance of experimental ventilator-induced lung injury has recently received a resounding illustration by the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network trial that showed a 22% reduction of mortality in patients with acute respiratory disease syndrome when lung mechanical stress was lessened by tidal volume reduction during mechanical ventilation. This clinical confirmation of the concept of ventilator-induced lung injury has also undisputedly substantiated the experimental observation that excessive tidal volume and/or end-inspiratory lung volume is the main determinant of ventilator-induced lung injury. More recently, attention has focused on the roles and implication in the pathogenesis of ventilator-induced lung injury of inflammatory cells and mediators that may be activated and released either in the alveolar space or in the systemic circulation because of the rupture of the alveolar-capillary barrier and on the cellular response to mechanical stress.
-
Curr Opin Crit Care · Feb 2002
ReviewReduced tidal volumes and lung protective ventilatory strategies: where do we go from here?
Three major determinants of lung injury associated with mechanical ventilation have been clearly identified: high pressure/high volume, the shear forces caused by intratidal collapse and decollapse leading to barotrauma/volotrauma/biotrauma. The lung protective strategy aims to reduce the impact of all three determinants. A groundbreaking study showed that reduced tidal volume is less dangerous than high tidal volume, but the researchers did not apply "full" lung protective strategy and did not take into account the shear forces. "Full" protective lung strategy was tested in only one study and in a limited number of patients. Several physiologic studies strongly suggest the advantages of the lung protective strategy.
-
Curr Opin Crit Care · Feb 2002
ReviewGenetics and the pathogenesis of adult respiratory distress syndrome.
Most human diseases are substantially affected by genetic factors. It now seems clear that the pathogenesis of most diseases lies in complex interactions among the genotype, the environment, and the nature of the process that leads to cell, tissue, organ, or systemic injury. The information derived from the knowledge of the recent completion of the human genome, when combined with the sophisticated tools of molecular biology, will provide the framework for more rapid identification of the genes responsible for susceptibility to disease. ⋯ Markers of susceptibility will indicate differences in individuals or populations that affect the body's response. The underlying principle of susceptibility markers is the interindividual differences that confer sensitivity or resistance to environmentally induced diseases. This article reviews some of those susceptibility factors for critical illness and acute lung injury.
-
Curr Opin Crit Care · Feb 2002
ReviewPulmonary versus extrapulmonary acute respiratory distress syndrome: different diseases or just a useful concept?
The acute respiratory distress syndrome may complicate both pulmonary and extrapulmonary conditions. There is a growing belief that the predisposition to, and clinical course of, the syndrome may be influenced by the extent to which the lung is directly involved in the precipitating pathologic changes. Several studies have highlighted differences in morphology and respiratory physiology between the two subgroups in the early stages of acute respiratory distress syndrome. ⋯ There are, however, inconsistencies between various studies addressing these issues, which may relate in part to differences in etiologic case mix. There are also practical difficulties in assigning certain cases to one of these two groups. Finally, there are as yet no outcome data to support any modification of clinical management on the basis of this distinction.