Current opinion in critical care
-
Cardiogenic shock is a multifactorial and diverse entity in which inotropes are the cornerstone therapy. Although published clinical trials have focused on pharmacologic treatment of cardiogenic shock, there is lack of an established and widely accepted decision-making algorithm on the use of inotropic agents in cardiogenic shock. ⋯ Finally, proposes an algorithm of inotropes and vasopressors use and their potential combinations based on the clinical stage of cardiogenic shock. This algorithm can be used as a guide during the initial management of cardiogenic shock while underlying cause investigation is underway.
-
Organ dysfunction is a key feature of cardiogenic shock. Active revascularization and contemporary management in intensive care has improved prognosis in cardiogenic shock, but mortality is still unacceptably high. This review will discuss the prevalence, manifestation, management and clinical impact of kidney and liver dysfunction in cardiogenic shock. ⋯ Monitoring renal and hepatic function and identifying injury and dysfunction of these organs is essential for the management and mortality risk assessment of patients in cardiogenic shock.
-
Mortality rates for acute decompensated heart failure and cardiogenic shock remain unacceptably high despite advances in medical therapy and mechanical circulatory support. Systems designed to quickly and accurately identify and risk stratify these patients are needed in order to improve survival. ⋯ Assessing the severity of heart failure is a critical step in enabling the targeting of appropriate therapies to the appropriate patients. A novel classification system allows for accurate and reproducible identification and risk stratification.
-
Data and interventional trials on vasopressor use during cardiogenic shock are scarce. Their use is limited by their side-effects and the lack of solid evidence regarding their effectiveness in improving outcomes. In the present article, we review the current use of vasopressor therapy during cardiogenic shock. ⋯ When blood pressure needs to be restored, norepinephrine is a reasonable first-line agent. Information regarding comparative effective outcomes is sparse and their use should be limited to a temporary measure as a bridge to recovery, mechanical circulatory support or heart transplantation.
-
Curr Opin Crit Care · Aug 2020
ReviewNovel approaches to metabolic assessment and structured exercise to promote recovery in ICU survivors.
Survivorship or addressing impaired quality of life (QoL) in ICU survivors has been named 'the defining challenge of critical care' for this century to address this challenge; in addition to optimal nutrition, we must learn to employ targeted metabolic/muscle assessment techniques and utilize structured, progressive ICU rehabilitative strategies. ⋯ The combination of nutrition with effective, early rehabilitation is highly likely to be essential to optimize muscle mass/strength and physical function in ICU survivors. Currently, technologies such as muscle-specific ultrasound and CPET testing show great promise to guide ICU muscle/functional recovery. Further, we must evolve improved ICU-rehabilitation strategies, as current methods are not consistently improving outcomes. In conclusion, we must continue to look to other areas of medicine and to athletes if we hope to ultimately improve 'ICU Survivorship'.