Current opinion in critical care
-
We describe the pathophysiology of cardiogenic shock (CS), from the main pathways to the inflammatory mechanisms and the proteomic features. ⋯ Understanding the pathophysiology of CS is important to treat it optimally.
-
Curr Opin Crit Care · Aug 2021
ReviewManaging the first 120 min of cardiogenic shock: from resuscitation to diagnosis.
Cardiogenic shock continues to carry a high mortality, and recent randomized trials have not identified novel therapies that improve survival. Early optimization of patients with confirmed or suspected cardiogenic shock is crucial, as patients can quickly transition from a hemodynamic shock state to a treatment-resistant hemometabolic shock state, where accumulated metabolic derangements trigger a self-perpetuating cycle of worsening shock. ⋯ Early stabilization of hemodynamics and end-organ function is necessary to achieve best outcomes in cardiogenic shock. Using a structured approach tailored to initial cardiogenic shock resuscitation may help to demonstrate benefit from novel therapies in the future.
-
Assess current potential catabolism-biomarkers to characterize patients developing prolonged critical illness. ⋯ UCR is an available and clinically applicable biomarker of catabolism. Similarly, sarcopenia index can be used to assess muscle mass and indirectly measure catabolism based on readily available biochemical measurements. The utility of novel biomarkers, such as GDF-15 is less established.
-
Cardiogenic shock is a complex clinical syndrome of end-organ hypoperfusion due to impaired cardiac performance. Although cardiogenic shock has traditionally been viewed as a monolithic disorder predominantly caused by severe left ventricular dysfunction complicating acute myocardial infarction (AMI), there is increasing recognition of the diverse causes of cardiogenic shock and wide spectrum of clinical severity. The purpose of this review is to describe the contemporary epidemiology of cardiogenic shock, including trends in clinical outcomes and recent efforts to refine risk assessment. ⋯ Improved clinical characterization and risk assessment of patients with cardiogenic shock may facilitate more effective clinical investigations of this morbid clinical syndrome.
-
Curr Opin Crit Care · Aug 2021
ReviewInterventional treatment of acute myocardial infarction-related cardiogenic shock.
Acute revascularization is with some evidence the only intervention proven to improve the prognosis in myocardial infarction-related cardiogenic shock but several interventions are continuously being investigated in order to increase survival among these patients. In this review, several aspects related to the interventional treatment of cardiogenic shock are discussed chronologically from symptom debut to leaving the cardiac catheterization laboratory. ⋯ Acute revascularization remains a crucial part of the initial management of acute myocardial infarction-related cardiogenic shock. Among cardiogenic shock patients presenting with multivessel disease, a culprit-only approach should be the routine strategy. Time to revascularization plays a crucial role in the setting of cardiogenic shock, why prehospital optimization and triaging may be the most important factors in order to improve prognosis in AMI-related cardiogenic shock.