Current opinion in critical care
-
Curr Opin Crit Care · Feb 2014
ReviewThe acute respiratory distress syndrome: incidence and mortality, has it changed?
The purpose of this review is to examine and discuss the incidence and outcome of patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). This is a challenging task, as there is no specific clinical sign or diagnostic test that accurately identifies and adequately defines this syndrome. ⋯ On the basis of current evidence, and despite the order of magnitude of reported European and USA incidence figures, it seems that the incidence and overall mortality of ARDS has not changed substantially since the original ARDSnet study. The current mortality of adult ARDS is still greater than 40%.
-
Fluid resuscitation in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is not well documented. Clinical evidence comes from studies in critically ill patients, but these patients respond differently to fluids depending on the presence or absence of sepsis. ⋯ In order to evaluate the pros and cons of using fluids in ARDS patients, it is important to carefully analyze the latest trials. Recent studies have emphasized the importance of better understanding endothelial pathophysiology during fluid management in ARDS patients. Certainly, further studies analyzing fluid strategies in septic and nonseptic ARDS patients are needed.
-
Prone position can prevent ventilator-induced lung injury in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients receiving conventional mechanical ventilation and, hence, may have the potential to improve survival from this basis. Even though no single randomized controlled trial has proven benefit on patient outcome until recently, two meta-analyses, one on grouped data and the other on individual data, have shown that patients with PaO2/FIO2 ratio less than 100 mmHg at the time of inclusion did benefit from prone position. As a fifth trial completed recently has shown a significant reduction in mortality in patients with severe and confirmed ARDS from using prone position, the purpose of this review is to revisit prone positioning in ARDS in the light of these new findings. ⋯ From the combined results of the two meta-analyses and the last randomized controlled trial, there is a very strong signal to use prone position in patients with severe ARDS, as early as possible and for long sessions.
-
Curr Opin Crit Care · Feb 2014
ReviewSpontaneous breathing in mild and moderate versus severe acute respiratory distress syndrome.
This review summarizes the most recent clinical and experimental data on the impact of spontaneous breathing in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). ⋯ Clinical and experimental studies show that controlled mechanical ventilation with muscle paralysis in the early phase of severe ARDS reduces lung injury and even mortality. At present, spontaneous breathing should be avoided in the early phase of severe ARDS, but considered in mild-to-moderate ARDS.
-
Curr Opin Crit Care · Feb 2014
ReviewHigh-frequency oscillatory ventilation for early acute respiratory distress syndrome in adults.
High-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) has been considered a potentially ideal mode of lung-protective ventilation. A recent meta-analysis suggested improved oxygenation and reduced mortality in adults and children with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), but the use of outdated control strategies and small numbers of patients in many of the studies rendered these findings hypothesis-generating only. ⋯ The OSCILLATE and OSCAR trials showed that the early application of HFOV in moderate-to-severe adult ARDS does not reduce mortality compared with conventional ventilation strategies. Future studies on HFOV will need to identify those patients who might benefit most from HFOV and to determine the best oscillator settings. Both goals require an improved capability of monitoring recruitment and overdistension, and oscillatory volumes.