Current opinion in critical care
-
Curr Opin Crit Care · Oct 2024
ReviewSepsis phenotypes, subphenotypes, and endotypes: are they ready for bedside care?
Sepsis remains a leading global cause of morbidity and mortality, and despite decades of research, no effective therapies have emerged. The lack of progress in sepsis outcomes is related in part to the significant heterogeneity of sepsis populations. This review seeks to highlight recent literature regarding sepsis phenotypes and the potential for further research and therapeutic intervention. ⋯ Sepsis therapies including care bundles, fluid resuscitation, and source control procedures may be better guided by validated phenotypes than universal application. Novel biomarkers may improve upon the sensitivity and specificity of existing markers and identify complications and sequelae of sepsis. Multiomics have demonstrated significant differences in sepsis populations, most notably expanding our understanding of immunosuppressed sepsis phenotypes. Despite progress, these findings may be limited by modest reproducibility and logistical barriers to clinical implementation. Further studies may translate recent findings into bedside care.
-
Curr Opin Crit Care · Oct 2024
ReviewLong-term outcomes in critically ill patients with acute respiratory failure.
This review aims to explore the latest evidence on long-term outcomes in patients admitted to the ICU because of acute respiratory failure (ARF). ⋯ There is not much data on the long-term outcomes of patients who have survived ARF. More follow-up studies should be conducted, especially in centers providing higher levels of costly care (e.g. ECMO). Randomized controlled trials on interventions for ARF should include patient-centered long-term outcomes in addition to mortality rates. The high mortality rates associated with ARF mandate collaboration among multiple centers to achieve an adequate sample size for studying the long-term outcomes of survivors.
-
Curr Opin Crit Care · Oct 2024
ReviewNeuroprognostication, withdrawal of care and long-term outcomes after cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
Survivors of cardiac arrest often have increased long-term risks of mortality and disability that are primarily associated with hypoxic-ischemic brain injury (HIBI). This review aims to examine health-related long-term outcomes after cardiac arrest. ⋯ HIBI remains the leading cause of disability among cardiac arrest survivors. No single strategy is likely to improve long term outcomes after cardiac arrest. A multimodal neuroprognostication approach (clinical examination, imaging, neurophysiology, and biomarkers) is recommended by guidelines, but fails to predict long-term outcomes. Cardiac arrest survivors often experience long-term disabilities that negatively impact their quality of life. The likelihood of such outcomes implements a multidisciplinary care an integral part of long-term recovery.
-
Acute kidney injury (AKI) in critical illness is common, and survivors are faced with a host of adverse outcomes. In this article, we review the current landscape of outcomes and care in survivors of AKI and critical illness. ⋯ Follow-up care of survivors of AKI and critical illness may improve outcomes and there is a need to prioritize transitions of care into the community. Further research is needed to elucidate the best ways to risk-stratify and manage post-AKI survivors to improve outcomes.
-
Curr Opin Crit Care · Oct 2024
ReviewMeeting complex multidimensional needs in older patients and their families during and beyond critical illness.
To highlight the emerging crisis of critically ill elderly patients and review the unique burden of multidimensional morbidity faced by these patients and caregivers and potential interventions. ⋯ The current article is an overview of the outcomes of older survivors of critical illness, putative interventions to mitigate the long-term morbidity of patients, and the consequences for families and caregivers. A multimodal longitudinal approach designed to follow patients for one or more years may foster a better understanding of multidimensional morbidity faced by vulnerable older patients and families and provides a detailed understanding of recovery trajectories in this unique population to optimize outcome, goals of care directives, and ongoing informed consent to ICU treatment.