The oncologist
-
Review Meta Analysis
Safety and Tolerability of PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors Compared with Chemotherapy in Patients with Advanced Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.
Compared with chemotherapy, significant improvement in survival outcomes with the programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1) inhibitors nivolumab and pembrolizumab and the programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitor atezolizumab has been shown in several types of advanced solid tumors. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare safety and tolerability between PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors and chemotherapy. ⋯ PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors are overall better tolerated than chemotherapy. Our results provide further evidence supporting the favorable risk/benefit ratio for PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. The Oncologist 2017;22:470-479 IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare summary toxicity endpoints and clinically relevant adverse events between programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors and chemotherapy. PD1/PD-L1 inhibitors were associated with a lower risk of treatment-related symptoms (fatigue, anorexia, nausea, diarrhea, constipation, and sensory neuropathy) but a higher risk of immune-related adverse events (AEs). Summary toxicity endpoints favor PD1/PD-L1 inhibitors (any all- and high-grade AEs and treatment discontinuation). PD1/PD-L1 inhibitors are overall better tolerated than chemotherapy. In addition to efficacy data from trials, our findings provide useful information for clinicians for well-balanced discussions with their patients on the risks and benefits of treatment options for advanced cancer.
-
No population-based longitudinal studies on end-of-life (EOL) expenditures were found for cancer decedents. ⋯ Taiwanese cancer decedents consumed considerable National Health Insurance disbursements at EOL, totaling more than was consumed in six developed non-U.S. countries surveyed in 2010. To slow increasing cost and improve EOL cancer care quality, interventions to ensure appropriate EOL care provision should target hospitals and clinicians less experienced in providing EOL care and those who tend to provide aggressive EOL care to high-risk patients. The Oncologist 2017;22:460-469Implications for Practice: Cancer-care costs are highest during the end-of-life (EOL) period for cancer decedents. This population-based study longitudinally examined EOL expenditures for cancer decedents. Mean annual EOL-care expenditures for Taiwanese cancer decedents increased from U.S. $49,591 to U.S. $68,773 from the year 2000 to 2010, with one third of spending in patients' last month and more than for six developed non-U.S. countries surveyed in 2010. To slow the increasing cost of EOL-cancer care, interventions should target hospitals/clinicians less experienced in providing EOL care, who tend to provide aggressive EOL care to high-risk patients, to avoid the physical suffering, emotional burden, and financial costs of aggressive EOL care.