Journal of evaluation in clinical practice
-
The efficacy, cost-effectiveness, and safety of a number of endoscopic procedures are largely dependent on optimal preparation. Despite this however, inadequate or suboptimal preparation is relatively common. Most studies have revealed inadequate preparation for between 20% and 30% of patients. This audit sought to examine the impact of English language proficiency, and ethnicity, on endoscopic preparation and procedure success or failure. ⋯ Amongst these patients, we found that a little more than 20% of participants were inadequately prepared for their endoscopic procedure. We found no relationship between language proficiency on preparation. Given the mixed literature on interventions to improve preparation before endoscopic procedures, further directions are identified to work toward the development and testing of a novel intervention amongst this population. In identifying those who may be at risk for inadequate preparation for endoscopic procedures, practice needs to take into account a range of factors beyond language and ethnicity. Furthermore, the persistent reliance on family members to interpret information sheets and preparation advice suggests that revision and/or development of culture and language-specific materials is necessary.
-
Misunderstanding medication dosage regimen instructions can lead to unintentional misuse of a prescribed medicine, non-adherence to providers' instructions, and other treatment-related issues. We aimed to evaluate the frequency of and factors associated with older patients' misunderstanding of medication dosage regimen instructions after consultation with a general practitioner. ⋯ The results showed that older people's misunderstandings of medication dosage regimen instructions after consultation with a general practitioner was greater than expected due to a range of factors, especially polypharmacy, poor literacy, poor memory, and having a job at the time of the interview. Health services and professionals should implement strategies to increase the quality of the guidance given to elderly individuals and to ensure their adherence to the regimen instructions of their medications.
-
Review Meta Analysis
Interventions to increase appointment attendance in safety net health centers: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Missed appointments are a persistent problem across healthcare settings, and result in negative outcomes for providers and patients. We aimed to review and evaluate the effectiveness of interventions designed to reduce missed appointments in safety net settings. ⋯ Strategies to improve appointment adherence in safety net hospitals varied widely and were only modestly effective. Further research harmonizing intervention delivery within each strategy and comparing strategies with the most potential for success is needed.
-
The Withdrawal Assessment Tool (WAT-1) is one of the most widely used clinician-reported outcome measures to evaluate iatrogenic withdrawal symptoms (IWS) in critically ill children. However, the WAT-1's measurement properties have not been aggregated. Aggregating psychometric research on the WAT-1 will enhance appropriate use, and outline gaps for future empirical research. The aim of this systematic review is to critically appraise, compare, and summarize the measurement properties and evidence quality, and describe the interpretability and feasibility of the WAT-1 for identifying IWS symptoms in critically ill children. ⋯ The results of this review indicate that the WAT-1 is a precise, easy to use measure of IWS in critically ill children despite some measurement property inconsistencies and gaps in the publication record. More information is required to support its content validity, responsiveness, internal consistency, cross-cultural validity, and interpretability.