The American journal of managed care
-
Psoriasis is a complex immune disorder associated with substantial metabolic and psychological comorbidities, posing challenges to treatment. Interleukin (IL)-23 inhibitors, the newest class of biologics for the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis, are more selective mechanistically than previous biologic classes and may have utility in management of patients with comorbidities, particularly those with metabolic syndrome (MetS). Moreover, recent long-term data suggest that IL-23 inhibitors offer unique advantages in both safety and efficacy. As the relationship between psoriasis and MetS continues to be elucidated, the availability of agents that are safe and effective in patients with and without comorbidities represents an important step in the spectrum of treatment.
-
To determine whether elimination of co-pays for prescription drugs affects medication adherence and total health care spending. ⋯ Elimination of co-pays for drugs indicated to treat chronic illnesses was associated with increases in medication adherence and reductions in overall spending of $63. Benefit designs that eliminate co-pays for patients with chronic illnesses may improve adherence and reduce the total cost of care.
-
The COVID-19 pandemic has fundamentally changed the workflow of clinics. We applied Lean Six Sigma processes to optimize clinic workflow to reduce patient wait times and improve the patient experience. ⋯ Simple, inexpensive measures can improve patient engagement and provide a safe setting for patients for clinic visits in the wake of COVID-19. In the future, clinics' common wait areas could be reappropriated to increase the number of clinic exam rooms.
-
To investigate the status of nursing interruption events during medicine administration and to analyze the factors influencing interruptions. ⋯ Nursing interruption events occur frequently, come from many sources, have complex causes, and commonly lead to negative outcomes. Interruption also has a time cost and can directly lead to medication errors.
-
Anesthesiology services are a focal point of policy making to address surprise medical billing. However, allowed amounts and charges for anesthesiology services have been understudied due to the specialty's unique conversion factor (CF) unit of payment and complex provider structures involving anesthesiologists and certified registered nurse anesthetists (CRNAs). This study compares payments for common outpatient anesthesiology services by commercial health plans, Medicare Advantage (MA), and traditional Medicare. ⋯ Common payment measures for anesthesia services-commercial allowed amounts, charges, or traditional Medicare-are highly divergent. MA plans' relatively low payments likely reflect the cost-containing influence of competition with traditional Medicare and MA's prohibition on balance billing. Out-of-network benchmarks for anesthesia services, such as the "qualifying payment amount" used in the No Surprises Act as a guidepost for arbitrators, may benefit from considering commercial payment differences across independent anesthesiologist, independent CRNA, or anesthesiologist-CRNA dyad provider structures.