Prehospital emergency care : official journal of the National Association of EMS Physicians and the National Association of State EMS Directors
-
In most states, prehospital professionals (PHPs) are mandated reporters of suspected abuse but cite a lack of training as a challenge to recognizing and reporting physical abuse. We developed a learning platform for the visual diagnosis of pediatric abusive versus non-abusive burn and bruise injuries and examined the amount and rate of skill acquisition. ⋯ An online module utilizing deliberate practice led to measurable skill improvement among PHPs for differentiating abusive from non-abusive burn and bruise injuries.
-
Case Reports
Point-of-care ultrasound diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia in a high-altitude, resource-poor setting.
Objective: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) for the evaluation of patients with suspected high-altitude pulmonary edema can be a useful tool in remote, high-altitude areas. The same technique can also yield high differential diagnostic accuracy for other relevant causes of acute respiratory distress at high altitude. With the recent development of high-quality, hand-held ultrasound devices, POCUS can be used with increasing reliability in such environments. ⋯ Methods: By using POCUS, we were able to exclude several important differential diagnoses and diagnose the patient with community-acquired pneumonia. Results: Our findings allowed us to start early on-site treatment and positively influenced shared decision-making with the patient, which led to a helicopter evacuation. Conclusions: This case illustrates that POCUS can be a valuable tool in remote, high-altitude regions and could allow healthcare providers to diagnose and follow-up with patients exhibiting acute respiratory symptoms when other radiological imaging modalities are not available.
-
Background: Naloxone is widely available to bystanders and first responders to treat patients with suspected opioid overdose. In these patients, the prognostic factors and potential benefits associated with additional naloxone administered by emergency medical services (EMS) are uncertain. Objectives: We sought to identify prognostic factors for admission to the hospital following prehospital administration of naloxone for suspected opioid overdose by bystanders and first responders. ⋯ Among 178 patients who had poor neurologic status (GCS ≤12) on paramedic arrival following naloxone administered by bystander or first responder, administration of additional naloxone was not associated with a better rate of neurologic improvement prior to hospital arrival (77% improved with additional naloxone, 81% improved without additional naloxone; OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.39-1.76). Conclusions: Among patients with suspected opioid overdose treated with naloxone by bystanders and first responders, a higher total dose of naloxone and polysubstance intoxication with additional CNS depressants were predictors of admission. Administration of additional naloxone by paramedics was not associated with a higher rate of neurologic improvement prior to hospital arrival, suggesting a ceiling effect on naloxone efficacy in opioid overdose.
-
Background: The care required for patients at times necessitates they be transferred to another hospital capable of providing specialized care, a process known as an interfacility transfer. Delays to appropriate care for critically ill patients are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Improving efficiencies in interfacility transport process can thus expedite the time to critical treatment. ⋯ Prepatching reduced in-hospital time by 4 minutes at the 90th quantile across all patients. Conclusion: Prepatching reduced paramedic in-hospital time for emergent interfacility transports. Although the clinical impact of this reduction in time is uncertain, prepatching may serve in facilitating shared mental modeling between paramedics and TMPs which may be beneficial to patient safety and team performance.
-
Multicenter Study Observational Study
Neurological outcome of chest compression-only bystander CPR in asphyxial and non-asphyxial out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: an observational study.
Background: According to guidelines and bystander skill, two different methods of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) are feasible: standard CPR (S-CPR) with mouth-to-mouth ventilations and chest compression-only CPR (CO-CPR) without rescue breathing. CO-CPR appears to be most effective for cardiac causes, but there is a lack of evidence for asphyxial causes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Thus, the aim of our study was to compare CO-CPR versus S-CPR in adult OHCA from medical etiologies and assess neurologic outcome in asphyxial and non-asphyxial causes. ⋯ Bystanders who performed S-CPR began more often immediately (89.0%; 95% CI [87.3-90.5] versus 78.2%; 95% CI [77.2-79.2]) and in younger subjects (64.1 years versus 65.7; p < 0.001). In the weighted population, subjects receiving bystander-initiated CO-CPR had an adjusted relative risk (aRR) of 1.04; 95% CI [0.79-1.38] of having a good neurological outcome at 30 days for all medical causes, 1.28; 95% CI [0.92-1.77] for asphyxial etiologies, 1.08; 95% CI [0.80-1.46] for non-asphyxial etiologies and 1.09; 95% CI [0.93-1.28] for cardiac-related OHCA. Conclusions: We observed no significant difference in neurological outcome when lay bystanders of adult OHCA initiated CO-CPR or S-CPR, whether the cause was asphyxial or not.