British journal of anaesthesia
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Post-circumcision analgesia: comparison of topical analgesia with dorsal nerve block using the midline and lateral approaches.
Forty-five patients undergoing circumcision were allocated randomly to one of three study groups to compare topical analgesia with dorsal nerve block using the midline or lateral approach. Pain scores, side effects and analgesic requirements were recorded after surgery. ⋯ Fentanyl requirements and pain scores were similar in patients who received a dorsal nerve block using either the midline or lateral approach. The incidence of side effects after surgery was similar in all three groups.
-
Preoperative fasting was introduced to reduce the risk and severity of aspiration pneumonitis. Adequate time (6h) must still be allowed before operation for solid foods to be emptied from the stomach. However, the overwhelming weight of evidence supports the practice of reducing the duration of the preoperative fluid fast for elective paediatric surgical patients [3, 15]. ⋯ Potential benefits of reduced thirst, better perioperative experience, improved compliance and reduced hypoglycaemia may be seen. Patients at risk of GOR and aspiration pneumonitis, including those presenting for emergency surgery, must receive special consideration. As aspiration pneumonitis is so rare, careful reporting of complications potentially related to a reduced fasting period is necessary.
-
A postal survey of previous paediatric anaesthetic training, current paediatric experience and management of an infant pyloromyotomy was undertaken among consultant anaesthetists in the UK. A total of 851 questionnaires were returned, giving a response rate of 31%; 352 (41%) consultants had at least one paediatric list each week, 180 (21%) anaesthetized more than one infant less than 6 months old each month and 373 (44%) had obtained more than 6 months' specialist training. ⋯ Choice of technique was related to the duration of specialist paediatric training and when it was received, but not to current paediatric anaesthetic experience. The results are discussed in relation to recently published recommendations on paediatric anaesthetic services.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section: comparison of infusions of phenylephrine and ephedrine.
Maternal cardiovascular changes and neonatal acid-base status were assessed in 29 healthy women undergoing elective lower segment Caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia. The patients were allocated randomly to one of three groups to receive an i.v. infusion of one of the following: ephedrine 1 mg min-1 (group E1: n = 10), ephedrine 2 mg min-1 (group E2: n = 9), or phenylephrine 10 micrograms min-1 (group P: n = 10). Invasive arterial pressure was monitored continuously and if hypotension occurred (defined as a 20% decrease from baseline, taken after i.v. preload administration), bolus doses of either ephedrine (6 mg in groups E1 and E2) or phenylephrine (20 micrograms in group P) were given. ⋯ The total time that the patients remained hypotensive was greatest in group P (P < 0.005), less in group E1 and least in group E2. Neonatal Apgar scores and acid-base profiles were similar in all three groups. In this study, an infusion of phenylephrine 10 micrograms min-1 with bolus doses of 20 micrograms was shown to be significantly less effective in maintaining systolic arterial pressure within 20% limits of baseline compared with an infusion of ephedrine 1 or 2 mg min-1 with bolus doses of 6 mg.