Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery
-
Meta Analysis Comparative Study
Comparison of mesh-plug and Lichtenstein for inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Mesh-plug and Lichtenstein techniques are among the most common used inguinal hernia repair procedures. The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the recurrence and other postoperative complications between mesh-plug technique and Lichtenstein operation in inguinal hernia repair. ⋯ Mesh-plug versus Lichtenstein procedures for inguinal hernia repair was comparable in most of the analyzed outcomes.
-
Clinical Trial
Does nerve identification during open inguinal herniorrhaphy reduce the risk of nerve damage and persistent pain?
Nerve identification during open inguinal hernia herniorrhaphy has been suggested as one of the factors that may reduce the risk of development of persistent postherniorrhaphy pain. In this prospective study, we evaluated whether intraoperative inguinal nerve identification influenced the risk of development of persistent postherniorrhaphy pain, sensory dysfunction in the groin and functional ability score after open hernia repair. ⋯ Although intraoperative inguinal nerve identification should be aimed at, other factors may contribute to the risk of nerve damage and persistent pain after open groin hernia repair.
-
Meta Analysis Comparative Study
Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing lightweight and heavyweight mesh for Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair.
Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair is associated with a low incidence of recurrence; however, the use of heavyweight mesh has been linked with chronic pain and foreign body sensation. It is hypothesized that the use of lightweight mesh may reduce these problems. This study aims to use meta-analysis to compare lightweight and heavyweight mesh for Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair. ⋯ The use of lightweight mesh in Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair is associated with less chronic pain, and foreign body sensation compared with heavyweight mesh without any difference in recurrence.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study
PerFix™ plug versus 4DDOME(®) implants for inguinal hernia repair: prospective multicentric randomised controlled trial.
Anterior mesh placement is the standard of care for hernia repair. The use of partially absorbable meshes may limit post-operative pain without altering the durability of the repair. We designed a prospective randomised study, which aims to compare the PerFix™ plug to the 4DDOME(®), a partially absorbable mesh. ⋯ This clinical study demonstrated similar short-term results. The 4DDOME(®) was associated with less pain and discomfort after 3 and 6 months. The combination of the dome shape and the double component mesh including an absorbable part meet the conflicting demands of early strength with a long-term low-weight material to minimise shrinkage and fibrosis. This design represents a potential advance in anterior tension-free hernia repair with mesh.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study
Five-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing a polypropylene mesh with a poliglecaprone and polypropylene composite mesh for inguinal hernioplasty.
The aim of this study was to assess whether partially absorbable monofilament mesh could influence postoperative pain and recurrence after Lichtenstein hernioplasty over the long term. ⋯ The use of partially absorbable mesh reduced postoperative pain during the short-term postoperative period. No difference in pain or recurrence rate was observed at 60 months.