European journal of pain : EJP
-
Response biases are systematic biases in responding to test items that are unrelated to the content of the items. Examples often reported in young children include choosing only the lowest or highest anchors of a scale, or choosing a left-to-right sequence of responses. We investigated the presence of response biases in young children's ratings of pain in hypothetical situations, as a way of gauging their developing understanding of a pain scale over the preschool years. ⋯ These results reveal that response biases are common in children under 5 years. Clinicians should consider self-report pain ratings from preschoolers with caution, seek complementary observational assessment, and investigate discrepancies between self-report and observational estimates of pain. Simplified forms, instructions, and methods of administration for self-report scales should be developed and validated for use with 3- and 4-year-olds.
-
Review Meta Analysis
Medication adherence in patients with chronic non-malignant pain: is there a problem?
Health care providers, treating patients with chronic non-malignant pain, often experience that medication is not as effective as expected. It is important to realize that the effectiveness of a pharmacological treatment can be influenced by the way the medication is taken. Medication adherence is a topic that gains more attention, especially in chronic conditions, because it affects treatment outcome. ⋯ Both overuse and underuse of medication occurs. However, due to the scarce literature and important methodological limitations, it is not possible to make firm conclusions concerning the impact on outcome, influencing variables and optimal intervention strategies. This review highlights some important gaps in the adherence literature in a chronic non-malignant pain population and sets the stage for future research.
-
Review Multicenter Study
A structured review of the evidence for pacing as a chronic pain intervention.
Pacing as an intervention appears with great regularity in the chronic pain management literature and yet what service providers actually mean by pacing is unclear and poorly defined. This short communication reports the findings of a structured review of the literature which examined the strength of the evidence for pacing as an intervention for people with chronic pain. ⋯ Although background literature demonstrates that pacing is often one part of a multidisciplinary intervention program, the research conducted on these programs presents pacing itself as an ill- or undefined construct. It is evident from this review that "pacing," while a widely employed term, lacks consensus of definition and a demonstrable evidence-base.
-
Electrical low-frequency stimulation (LFS) of spinal afferents induces long-term depression (LTD) of nociceptive processing in rodents. LTD and its parameters in man are largely unknown. This study addresses the hypothesis that LTD of spinal nociception and pain in man depends on LFS frequency (0.5, 1, 2 Hz), number of electrical pulses (300, 600, 1200), intensity (relating to pain threshold I(P): 1 x I(P), 2 x I(P), 4 x I(P)), and on LFS repetition. ⋯ LFS with intensities 2 x I(P) and 4 x I(P) evoked sustained depression of SEP and pain perception in comparison to Control and 1 x I(P) LFS. Established LTD after single LFS was amplified by an additional second LFS. Hence this study provides electrophysiological and psychophysical evidence for LTD of spinal nociceptive processing and pain perception in man and indicates appropriate LFS parameters 1 Hz, 1200 pulses and 4 x I(P) for future studies on human LTD.
-
Comparative Study
The contribution of self-efficacy and depression to disability and work status in chronic pain patients: a comparison between Australian and Brazilian samples.
There is evidence that cognitions (beliefs) and mood contribute to physical disability and work status in people with chronic pain. However, most of the current evidence comes from North America and Europe. This study examined the contribution of demographic, pain and psychosocial factors to disability and work status in chronic pain patients in two matched samples from quite different countries (Australia and Brazil). ⋯ Catastrophising and pain acceptance did not contribute to disability or unemployment in either sample. These findings confirm key aspects of biopsychosocial models of pain in two culturally and linguistically different chronic pain samples from different countries. They suggest that different chronic pain populations may share more similarities than differences.