Journal of clinical monitoring and computing
-
J Clin Monit Comput · Dec 2024
Multicenter Study Observational StudyCharacterization of intracranial compliance in healthy subjects using a noninvasive method - results from a multicenter prospective observational study.
An FDA-approved non-invasive intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring system enables the assessment of ICP waveforms by revealing and analyzing their morphological variations and parameters associated with intracranial compliance, such as the P2/P1 ratio and time-to-peak (TTP). The aim of this study is to characterize intracranial compliance in healthy volunteers across different age groups. ⋯ The study revealed that the P2/P1 ratio and TTP are influenced by age and sex in healthy individuals, with men displaying lower values than women, and both ratios increasing with age. These findings suggest potential avenues for further research with larger and more diverse samples to establish reference values for comparison in various health conditions.
-
J Clin Monit Comput · Aug 2024
Multicenter StudyICP wave morphology as a screening test to exclude intracranial hypertension in brain-injured patients: a non-invasive perspective.
Intracranial hypertension (IH) is a life-threating condition especially for the brain injured patient. In such cases, an external ventricular drain (EVD) or an intraparenchymal bolt are the conventional gold standard for intracranial pressure (ICPi) monitoring. However, these techniques have several limitations. ⋯ To conclude, the P2/P1 ratio of the noninvasive ICP waveform showed in this study a high Negative Predictive Value and Likelihood Ratio in different acute neurological conditions to rule out IH. As a result, this parameter may be beneficial in situations where invasive methods are not feasible or unavailable and to screen high-risk patients for potential invasive ICP monitoring. Trial registration: At clinicaltrials.gov under numbers NCT05121155 (Registered 16 November 2021-retrospectively registered) and NCT03144219 (Registered 30 September 2022-retrospectively registered).
-
J Clin Monit Comput · Apr 2024
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter StudyCan perioperative pCO2 gaps predict complications in patients undergoing major elective abdominal surgery randomized to goal-directed therapy or standard care? A secondary analysis.
The difference between venous and arterial carbon dioxide pressure (pCO2 gap), has been used as a diagnostic and prognostic tool. We aimed to assess whether perioperative pCO2 gaps can predict postoperative complications. This was a secondary analysis of a multicenter RCT comparing goal-directed therapy (GDT) to standard care in which 464 patients undergoing high-risk elective abdominal surgery were included. Arterial and central venous blood samples were simultaneously obtained at four time points: after induction, at the end of surgery, at PACU/ICU admission, and PACU/ICU discharge. ⋯ A weak correlation between ScvO2 and pCO2 gaps was found for all timepoints (ρ was between - 0.40 and - 0.29 for all timepoints, p < 0.001). The pCO2 gap did not differ between GDT and standard care at any of the selected time points. In our study, pCO2 gap was a poor predictor of major postoperative complications at all selected time points. Our research does not support the use of pCO2 gap as a prognostic tool after high-risk abdominal surgery. pCO2 gaps were comparable between GDT and standard care. Clinical trial registration Netherlands Trial Registry NTR3380.
-
J Clin Monit Comput · Aug 2023
Multicenter StudyAgreement between pulse oximetry and arterial oxygen saturation measurement in critical care patients during COVID-19: a cross-sectional study.
Some publications suggest that pulse oximetry measurement (SpO2) might overestimate arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2) measurement in COVID-19 patients. This study aims to evaluate the agreement between SpO2 and SaO2 among COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients. We conducted a multicenter, prospective study including consecutive intensive care patients from October 15, 2020, to March 4, 2021, and compared for each measurement the difference between SpO2 and SaO2, also called the systematic bias. ⋯ In our population, agreement between SpO2 and SaO2 is acceptable. During the COVID-19 pandemic, SaO2 remains an efficient monitoring tool to characterise the level of hypoxemia and follow therapeutic interventions. As is already known about general intensive care unit patients, the greater hypoxemia, the weaker the correlation between SpO2 and SaO2.
-
J Clin Monit Comput · Feb 2023
Multicenter Study Observational StudyIntra-abdominal hypertension in cardiac surgery patients: a multicenter observational sub-study of the Accuryn registry.
Intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) is frequently present in the critically ill and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Conventionally, intermittent 'spot-check' manual measurements of bladder pressure in those perceived as high risk are used as surrogates for intra-abdominal pressure (IAP). True patterns of IAH remain unknown. ⋯ For maximum consecutive duration of IAH, 84% (115/137) of patients spent at least 12 h in grade I, 62% (85/137) in grade II, 18% (25/137) in grade III, and 2% (3/137) in grade IV IAH. During the first 48 h after cardiac surgery, IAH is common and persistent. Improved and automated monitoring of IAP will increase the detection of IAH-which normally would remain undetected using traditional intermittent monitoring methods.