Journal of palliative medicine
-
Background: Research shows that access to palliative care can help patients avoid dying in hospital. However, access to palliative care services during the terminal hospitalization, specifically, has not been well studied. Objective: To determine whether access to palliative care varied by disease trajectory among terminal hospitalizations. Design, Setting, Subjects: We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study of decedents who died in hospital in Ontario, Canada between 2012 and 2015 by using linked administrative databases. Measurements: Using hospital and physician billing codes, we classified access to palliative care in three mutually exclusive groups of patients with terminal hospitalization: (1) main diagnosis for admission was palliative care; (2) main diagnosis was not palliative care, but the patient received palliative care specialist consultation; and (3) the patient did not receive any specialist palliative care. We conducted a logistic regression on odds of never receiving palliative care. Results: We identified 140,475 decedents who died in an inpatient hospital unit, which represents 42% of deaths. ⋯ In our regression, dying of organ failure or frailty compared with cancer increased the odds of never receiving palliative care by 4.07 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.95-4.20) and 4.51 (95% CI: 4.35-4.68) times, respectively. Conclusions: A third of hospital deaths had no palliative care involvement. Access to specialist palliative care is particularly lower for noncancer decedents. Inpatient units play an important role in providing end-of-life care.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
Evaluation of a Novel Educational Intervention to Improve Conversations About Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators Management in Patients with Advanced Heart Failure.
Background: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) reduce the incidence of sudden cardiac death for high-risk patients with heart failure (HF), but shocks from these devices can also cause pain and anxiety at the end of life. Although professional society recommendations encourage proactive discussions about ICD deactivation, clinicians lack training in conducting these conversations, and they occur infrequently. Methods: As part of a six-center randomized controlled trial, we evaluated the educational component of a multicomponent intervention shown to increase conversations about ICD deactivation by clinicians who care for a subset of patients with advanced HF. ⋯ Preworkshop scores showed high baseline levels of confidence (4.36, standard deviation [SD] = 0.70) and skill (4.08, SD = 0.72), whereas comparisons of pre- and postworkshop scores showed nonsignificant decreases in confidence (-1.16, p = 0.252) and skill (-0.20, p = 0.843) after the training session. Conclusions: Our findings showed no significant changes in self-assessment ratings immediately after the educational intervention. However, our data did demonstrate that HF clinicians had high baseline self-perceptions of their skills in advance care planning conversations and appear to be well-primed for further professional development to improve communication in the setting of advanced HF.
-
Background: The Chinese diaspora experiences disparate end-of-life (EOL) care outcomes. Advance care planning (ACP) may be an effective intervention to improve EOL care, but its reception and uptake in the Chinese diaspora are unknown. Objective: Review and synthesize current literature to develop a culturally tailored ACP framework for the Chinese diaspora. ⋯ Conclusion: The Chinese diaspora population is willing to engage in ACP. An individualized, culturally sensitive approach that captures and maximizes harmony will be central to the success of ACP in this population. Further work is required to understand the influence of serious illness, spirituality, and family on ACP.