Journal of palliative medicine
-
Background: The determination of what makes a medical treatment inappropriate is unclear with a small likelihood of consensus. Objectives: This study aimed to explore how clinicians in cardiology perceive "inappropriate treatment" and to collate the common profiles of cardiology patients receiving likely "inappropriate treatment" as perceived by clinicians in a multiethnic Asian context. Methods: A qualitative study was conducted using semistructured in-depth interviews with 32 clinicians involved in the care for cardiology patients at a large national cardiology center in Singapore. ⋯ Patient prognostic profiles, characterized as likely to have received inappropriate treatment by clinicians, were organized into six categories according to demographic, clinical, and functional factors. Conclusions: The perception of inappropriateness of treatments among clinicians in cardiology was primarily focused on patient-related outcomes. Collated patient profiles may serve as meaningful indicators of patient cases receiving potentially inappropriate treatment for further research and intervention.
-
Background: Over one million Americans have died from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Increased isolation resulting from social distancing, public health restrictions, and hospital visit limitations may affect the ability to perform normal mourning practices. Grief experts expect higher rates of prolonged grief disorder (PGD) because of the pandemic, but empirical evidence is limited. ⋯ In adjusted analyses, COVID-19-related death was associated with an increased PG-13-R score (coefficient: 6.17; p = 0.031), while hospice use was associated with a decline in the PG-13-R score (coefficient: -3.68; p = 0.049). Conclusion: Individuals have adapted to COVID-19 societal changes, including how they grieve. However, COVID-19-related deaths may lead to a higher risk for PGD, consistent with COVID-19 grief studies globally.