Journal of palliative medicine
-
Background: The pediatric palliative care (PPC) sets up an interdisciplinary approach of chronic complex diseases throughout birth to adolescence. It encompasses countless contrasts in development and diagnosis scopes, which make this area a challenge to nonpediatric practitioners. Objective: We sought to assess the most prevalent diseases in follow-up of the PPC team. ⋯ The patients were older at diagnosis (6.9 years) and at PPC referral (13.2 years) than patients with epidermolysis bullosa and skeletal disorders and dysmorphological and chromosomal disorders were younger on referral. Conclusion: There are a lot of complex chronic conditions which could benefit from palliative care in pediatric setting. However, epidemiological and symptomatological assessment of the health service is necessary to provide an appropriate care to the country's reality.
-
Background: Hospitals often lack bereavement programs. Bereaved families often navigate grief support on their own. This problem was complicated by the early COVID-19 pandemic. ⋯ Fourteen NOK accepted a referral for bereavement support. Conclusions: This cost neutral pilot successfully connected 81 NOK with either a pilot chaplain or SW for bereavement support. Fourteen NOK accepted referral for a community bereavement resource.
-
Observational Study
Cost and Utilization Implications of a Health Plan's Home-Based Palliative Care Program.
Background: A California-based health plan offered home-based palliative care (HBPC) to members who needed support at home but did not yet qualify for hospice. Objectives: This study compares hospital and emergency department (ED) utilization and costs and mortality for individuals receiving HBPC to a cohort not receiving palliative care services (Usual Care). Design: This is an observational retrospective study using claims data covering a prestudy period and a study period during which time half of the study population received HBPC services. ⋯ Average time in the study period was longer for the HBPC group than that in the Usual Care group, indicating that they lived longer or transitioned to hospice later. Conclusion: Although individuals in both groups were living with serious illnesses for which worsening health and increased acute care utilization are expected over time, both groups had reduced acute care utilization and costs during the study period compared with the prestudy period. Reduced utilization and costs were equivalent for both groups.
-
Background: Terminological problems concerning sedation in palliative care and consequences for research and clinical decision making have been reported frequently. Objectives: To gather data on the application of definitions of sedation practices in palliative care to clinical cases and to analyze implications for high-quality definitions. Design: We conducted an online survey with a convenience sample of international experts involved in the development of guidelines on sedation in palliative care and members of the European Association for Palliative Care (EAPC). ⋯ Conclusions: Definitions of sedation in palliative care are frequently incorrectly applied to clinical case scenarios under simplified conditions. This suggests that clinical communication and research might be negatively influenced by misunderstandings and inconsistent labeling or reporting of data. Clinical Trial Registration Number: DRKS00015047.