J Trauma
-
Comparative Study
Outcome and cost of trauma among the elderly: a real-life model of a single-payer reimbursement system.
As our population ages, the number of elderly trauma patients (age > or = 65 years) increases. Studies have demonstrated increased mortality and cost for a given injury severity in the elderly compared with younger patients. The financial viability of trauma centers in the United States has been an area of concern for many years. As reimbursement diminishes for privately insured patients, the ability to finance the care of the indigent is jeopardized. Medicare, the single-payer insurance plan for the elderly, reimburses at a lower rate than standard private insurance carriers. We examined the differences in outcome and cost between the elderly and younger patients and the financial burden imposed by care for elderly trauma. Our hypothesis was that elderly trauma patients would have poorer outcomes, higher cost, and generate greater financial losses than younger patients. ⋯ Despite higher injury severity and lower survival probability for the elderly, the length of hospital and intensive care unit stays, as well as the percentage of admissions to the intensive care unit, were similar. The per capita cost of hospital care for the elderly was lower than for younger patients, whereas reimbursement was higher, primarily because 98% of elderly patients were insured. Medicare, the single-payer insurance plan for the elderly, adequately reimburses for elderly trauma care. This implies that universal insurance coverage for all trauma patients would be desirable, even if reimbursement rates decreased significantly. The increased mortality in the elderly requires continued study and diligence.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
The role of presacral drainage in the management of penetrating rectal injuries.
To compare in a randomized, prospective manner infectious complication rates associated with presacral drainage versus no drainage in the presence of penetrating rectal injury. ⋯ We conclude that presacral drainage for penetrating rectal injuries has no effect on infectious complications associated with the rectal injuries.
-
Review Case Reports
Traumatic thoracobiliary fistula: report of a case successfully managed conservatively, with an overview of current diagnostic and therapeutic options.
Thoracobiliary fistula is a rare complication of hepatic trauma that may present a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. We report a case of a thoracobiliary fistula complicating thoracoabdominal trauma. ⋯ Conservative therapy consists of a safe temporizing measure during the workup and may, on occasion, be the only therapy that is necessary provided that controlled drainage of the fistula is achieved. The current recommendation would be the exhaustion of nonoperative therapeutic modalities before resorting to surgical intervention.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Kapandji pinning or closed reduction for extra-articular distal radius fractures.
In a randomized prospective trial, closed reduction and plaster application was compared with Kapandji pinning. Closed reduction and plaster cast application was performed in 50 patients, Kapandji pinning in 48 patients. ⋯ In terms of maintenance of reduction and functional outcome at 1-year follow-up, no statistically significant differences were found between the two groups. We conclude, therefore, that both techniques can be applied to extra-articular fractures of the distal radius according to the characteristics of the forearm and the surgeon's or the patient's need.
-
More than 20 years ago, critical care workers first observed that oxygenation improved when patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome were ventilated in the prone position. In recent reports, on turning prone, from 50 to 100% of patients improve oxygenation to a degree sufficient to allow a reduction in the level of positive end-expiratory pressure or fraction of inspired oxygen. ⋯ Although many questions regarding the role of prone ventilation are unanswered, of greatest importance is whether this technique reduces morbidity and mortality of patients with acute respiratory failure. Only carefully conducted, randomized trials can answer this question.