Neurosurg Focus
-
Review
Hearing preservation surgery for vestibular schwannoma: experience with the middle fossa approach.
In the early 1960s William F. House developed the middle fossa approach for the removal of small vestibular schwannomas (VSs) with the preservation of hearing. It is the best approach for tumors that extend laterally to the fundus of the internal auditory canal, although it does have the potential disadvantage of increased facial nerve manipulation, especially for tumors arising from the inferior vestibular nerve. The aim of this study was to monitor the hearing preservation and facial nerve outcomes of this approach. ⋯ The middle fossa approach for the resection of small VSs with hearing preservation is a viable and relatively safe option. It should be considered among the various options available for the management of small, growing VSs.
-
Review Case Reports
Extent of resection and early postoperative outcomes following removal of cystic vestibular schwannomas: surgical experience over a decade and review of the literature.
Vestibular schwannomas (VSs) are benign tumors of the eighth cranial nerve sheath, representing approximately 6%-8% of all newly diagnosed brain tumors, with an annual incidence of 2000-2500 cases in the US. Although most of these lesions are solid, cystic vestibular schwannomas (CVSs) compose 4%-20% of all VSs and are commonly larger at the time of presentation. The authors present their experience with the operative management of CVSs, including surgical approach, extent of resection, and postoperative facial nerve outcomes. The literature pertaining to clinical and histopathological differences between CVSs and their solid counterparts is reviewed. ⋯ Cystic vestibular schwannoma represents a clinical and surgical entity separate from its solid counterpart, as demonstrated by its more rapid clinical course and early surgical outcomes. Facial nerve grades may correlate with the degree of tumor resection, trending toward poorer grades with more significant resections. Although GTR is recommended whenever possible, performing an STR when facial nerve preservation is in jeopardy to improve facial nerve outcomes is the preferred strategy at the authors' institution.
-
The object of this study was to evaluate facial nerve outcomes in the surgical treatment of large vestibular schwannomas (VSs; ≥ 2.5 cm maximal or extrameatal cerebellopontine angle diameter) based on both the operative approach and extent of tumor resection. ⋯ In a pooled patient population from studies evaluating the treatment of large VSs, subtotal and near-total resections were shown to produce better facial nerve outcomes when compared with gross-total resections. The translabyrinthine and retrosigmoid surgical approaches are likely to result in similar rates of good facial nerve outcomes. Both of these approaches show better facial nerve outcomes when compared with the extended translabyrinthine approach, which is typically reserved for especially large tumors. The reported literature on treatment of large VSs is extremely heterogeneous and minimal consistency in reporting outcomes was observed.
-
Various studies report outcomes of vestibular schwannoma (VS) surgery, but few studies have compared outcomes across the various approaches. The authors conducted a systematic review of the available data on VS surgery, comparing the different approaches and their associated complications. ⋯ The middle cranial fossa approach seems safest for hearing preservation in patients with smaller tumors. Based on the data, the retrosigmoid approach seems to be the most versatile corridor for facial nerve preservation for most tumor sizes, but it is associated with a higher risk of postoperative pain and CSF fistula. The translabyrinthine approach is associated with complete hearing loss but may be useful for patients with large tumors and poor preoperative hearing.
-
Hospitalization cost and patient outcome after acoustic neuroma surgery depend on several factors. There is a paucity of data regarding the relationship between demographic features such as age, sex, race, insurance status, and patient outcome. Apart from demographic factors, there are several hospital-related factors and regional issues that can affect outcomes and hospital costs. To the authors' knowledge, no study has investigated the issue of regional disparity across the country in terms of cost of hospitalization and discharge disposition. ⋯ The authors' study shows that several factors can affect patient outcome and hospital charges for patients who have undergone acoustic neuroma surgery. Factors such as younger age, higher ZIP code income, less comorbidity, private insurance, elective surgery, and the West region predicted for better disposition outcome. However, the West region, higher comorbidities, and weekend admissions were associated with higher hospitalization costs.