Minerva anestesiologica
-
In recent years, we have considerably widened our knowledge of the pathophysiology of sepsis and some procedures, aiming both to relieve symptoms and control the inflammation/coagulation reaction, have proven to be effective in increasing survival. This improves when mechanical ventilation is applied with low tidal volumes, fluid replacement and the use of cardioactive drugs are titrated on the oxygen saturation of hemoglobin in the central venous system and blood glucose does not exceed certain limits. ⋯ The only molecule which has proven to be notably effective in reducing mortality is Activated Protein C interacting on coagulation/fibrinolysis, as well as on inflammation processes. Multinodal modulation of several interdependent processes may be the probable reason for the proven effectiveness of this treatment.
-
Minerva anestesiologica · Jun 2003
Alemanno's brachial plexus block ten years later: topographic study of the anesthetized areas.
The study analyzes the extension of anesthesia induced by Alemanno's brachial plexus block technique on the various areas of competence of the different nerves. ⋯ Alemanno's technique is recommended for operations on the shoulder and humerus, whereas more peripheral techniques may be preferable for interventions on the forearm and hand.
-
Minerva anestesiologica · May 2003
Review[Prevention of hypotension in spinal anaesthesia carried out for caesarean section].
After describing the most commonly applied obstetric indications for caesarean section and the respective percentages reported in countries that are comparable with Italy in terms of health care standards, the clinical reasons and requirements on the basis of which it is considered that spinal anaesthesia is first choice compared to general anaesthesia in obstetrical surgery are outlined. This evidence is confirmed by the spinal anaesthesia/general anaesthesia ratio encountered in the major national and international Obstetric Hospitals. Maternal hypotension remains the most frequent and clinically important complication consequent on spinal anaesthesia in pregnant women at term. ⋯ It is pointed out that certain procedures have become part of standard practice but their effectiveness has not yet been confirmed while others are not only ineffective but also expose mother and foetus to potential complications. For others again the jury is still out on their real effectiveness. Finally, the techniques that are currently considered to be effective and shared by the majority of authors are described and these must therefore be included in the procedural protocols regarding spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section.
-
Minerva anestesiologica · May 2003
Review[Emergencies in cardiac surgery: prophylaxis or correction?].
Management of coagulation during cardiac surgery is always challenging for the anesthesiologist, even in elective operations. The strict linkage between coagulation and inflammation is amplified during cardiopulmonary bypass due to the contact of the blood with the foreign surfaces. In emergencies, coagulative derangement could be worse but the cardiocirculatory instability and parenchimal failure often overcome the attention to this problem.
-
Minerva anestesiologica · May 2003
Review Comparative StudyPost-operative epidural versus intravenous patient-controlled analgesia.
Patient-controlled analgesia techniques have opened a new dimension to individualize patient's need for analgesia, in the treatment of acute post-operative pain. These techniques can be used intravenously, in the epidural space, and into peripheral nerve sheets. There is a common consensus that intravenous patient-controlled analgesia should not have a continuous infusion while epidural patient-controlled analgesia (PCEA) should be programmed with a continuous infusion. ⋯ The continuous epidural infusion of opioids has the advantages of fewer fluctuations in cerebrospinal fluid concentrations of drug, but it is necessary to administer a loading bolus, to overcome the fact that it takes several hours to provide adequate analgesia. The advantages of epidural versus intravenous patient-controlled analgesia are represented by better analgesia and a reduced opioids requirement, while the advantages when compared to epidural continuous infusion are: increased efficiency, self-adjustment by the patient, higher patient satisfaction, less sedation, and lower opioids dosage. The clinical advantages of PCEA may outweigh the greater cost and invasiveness of this technique.