World Neurosurg
-
Review Meta Analysis Comparative Study
Comparison of Fusion Rate and Clinical Outcomes in Minimally Invasive and Conventional Posterior Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Disease: A Network Meta-Analysis.
The fusion rate, clinical efficacy, and complications of minimally invasive fusion surgery and open fusion surgery in the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease are still unclear. ⋯ Compared to conventional open surgery, minimally invasive fusion surgery offered better scores for low back pain and Oswestry Disability Index, lower complication rates, reduced bleeding, and shorter hospital stays. However, minimally invasive fusion surgery did not show a significant advantage in terms of fusion rate and had a longer operative time.
-
Review Meta Analysis Comparative Study
Cortical Trajectory versus Traditional Pedicle Screw Trajectory in Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Meta-Analysis of Complications and Clinical Outcomes.
Lumbar degenerative disease imposes a substantial burden on global health care expenditures. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) using either traditional trajectory (TT) pedicle screws or cortical bone trajectory (CBT) pedicle screws has become increasingly common. This meta-analysis evaluated outcomes and safety of open TLIF with TT compared with CBT. ⋯ TT and CBT in TLIF procedures demonstrated comparable rates of complications, reoperations, and patient-reported outcome measures. Despite similar operating room times and estimated blood loss, the CBT group exhibited shorter incision lengths and shorter LOS than the TT group. Both CBT and TT pedicle screws are safe and effective options for TLIF. There are potential benefits to CBT such as shorter incision and LOS, although TT remains an essential tool for spinal instrumentation techniques.
-
Review Meta Analysis Comparative Study
Pipeline Embolization Device and Flow Re-Direction Endoluminal Device for Intracranial Aneurysms: A Comparative Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Study.
When it comes to intracranial aneurysms, the quest for more effective treatments is ongoing. Flow diversion represents a growing advancement in this field. This review seeks to compare 2 variants of the endovascular flow diversion method: the Flow Re-Direction Endoluminal Device (FRED) and the Pipeline Embolization Device (PED). ⋯ This meta-analysis suggests comparable efficacy but different safety profiles between FRED and PED in treating intracranial aneurysms. FRED demonstrated a higher rate of good modified Rankin scores, while PED showed increased hemorrhage and re-treatment rates. Understanding these differences is crucial for informed decision-making in clinical practice.
-
Review Meta Analysis
Seniority of surgeon in CSDH Recurrence: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is increasingly common, particularly in the older and multimorbid population. Surgical proficiency in management is required in the early years of U. K. neurosurgical training with most cases performed by nonconsultant-grade surgeons. The aim of this systematic review was to examine the effect of surgeon seniority on recurrence for patients with CSDH. ⋯ The risk of bias was assessed using the National Institute of Health risk of bias toolkit. Five studies were included in the final analysis (n = 941 total patients). Individually, no study identified a significant difference in recurrence rate and postoperative complications between senior and junior neurosurgeons. On meta-analysis, junior-led evacuations had lower recurrence rates on pooled univariable analysis (12.0% vs. 17.9% [odds ratio 0.48, 95% confidence interval 0.29-0.78, I2 = 0%]) (3 studies). Seniority of surgeon was not associated with increased rates of recurrence patients undergoing CSDH surgery. Complexity of operation may be a confounding factor in observed lower recurrence rates with more junior operators.
-
Review Meta Analysis
Cisternostomy as an Adjuvant or Standalone Approach for Management of Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of morbidity in all age groups worldwide. Decompressive craniectomy (DC) is a salvage procedure in patients with TBI. The outcome and quality of life following DC is questionable. Basal cisternostomy (BC) has been proposed to reduce edema and lead to brain relaxation. It was initially used as an adjunct in TBI patients, thereby improving outcomes. With gaining popularity among neurosurgeons, BC was used as a standalone approach in TBI patients. This network meta-analysis aims to analyze the role of BC either as an adjunct or as a standalone approach in managing TBI patients. ⋯ Our analysis showed that BC alone was associated with lower in-hospital mortality rates in TBI patients. DC with BC had decreased the requirement of mechanical ventilation. However, larger multi-centric studies from other parts of the world are required to confirm these findings.