Inquiry J Health Car
-
Patient injuries are thought to have a substantial financial impact on the health care system, but recent studies have been limited to estimating the costs of adverse drug events in teaching hospitals. This analysis estimated the costs of all types of patient injuries from a representative sample of hospitals in Utah and Colorado. We detected 459 adverse events (of which 265 were preventable) by reviewing the medical records of 14,732 randomly selected 1992 discharges from 28 hospitals. ⋯ Fifty-seven percent of the adverse event health care costs, and 46% of the preventable adverse event costs were attributed to outpatient medical care. Surgical complications, adverse drug events, and delayed or incorrect diagnoses and therapies were the most expensive types of adverse events. The costs of adverse events were similar to the national costs of caring for people with HIV/AIDS, and totaled 4.8% of per capita health care expenditures in these states.
-
Inquiry J Health Car · Jan 1999
The Federal Employees Health Benefits Plan: implications for medicare reform.
This paper suggests that the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program (FEHBP) is perhaps a model for Medicare reform. First, we introduce the FEHBP and describe important features, such as the method for determining the government's premium contribution. ⋯ We conclude that the FEHBP has experienced some selection problems, but not enough to prevent it from offering a wide variety of choices without standardized benefits or direct risk adjustment. For a demonstration of competitive pricing in Medicare, the fourth section compares the FEHBP to two models of Medicare reform: "FEHBP for Medicare," proposed by Butler and Moffit; and the "Denver design."
-
The 1997 Balanced Budget Act provided for a medical savings account (MSA) Medicare demonstration program. This study simulates the impact on Medicare costs of permitting beneficiaries to enroll in MSAs, using a 23,576-person sample of Medicare beneficiaries in 1992. Our simulations differed with respect to assumptions about supplementary insurance coverage, whether the government or the private sector offers MSA coverage, the degree of selection bias, and the size of the induction effects.