Arzneimittel Forsch
-
Arzneimittel Forsch · Jan 2009
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative StudyBioequivalence study of two minocycline capsule formulations in healthy volunteers.
The bioequivalence of two capsule formulations containing 100 mg minocycline was assessed in 12 healthy adult male and female volunteers in a crossover, randomized, single-blind study. The participating volunteers were required to fast overnight and in the next morning and were given orally one capsule of the test drug (Acnez) or one capsule of the reference drug. Blood samples were drawn immediately before taking the drug (control), and at 0.33, 0.67, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 h after drug administration. ⋯ The 90% confidence intervals (CIs) were 89.26-108.19% for AUC(t), 89.95-107.41% for AUC(inf), and 89.55-105.73% for C(max). Using Wilcoxon matched-pairs test on the original data, there was no statistically significant difference found between the test and the reference drug products for t(max), values. It can be concluded that the two minocycline capsules (test drug and reference drug) are bioequivalent in terms of the rate and extent of absorption.
-
Arzneimittel Forsch · Jan 2009
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative StudyComparative bioavailability study of amisulpride tablets in healthy Indian volunteers.
An improved HPLC method was developed and validated for the determination of concentration of amisulpride (CAS 71675-85-9) in human plasma, an attempt to compare the bioavailability of two amisulpride tablet formulations (reference and test) containing 200 mg of amisulpride. Both the formulations were administered orally as a single dose, separated by washout period of 1 week. This HPLC method validated by examining the precision and accuracy for the inter-day and intra-day runs in a linear concentration range of 50-1200 ng/ml. ⋯ The formulations were compared using the parameters like area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC0-t), area under the plasma concentration-time curve from zero to infinity (AUC0-infinity), peak plasma concentration (Cmax), and time to reach peak plasma concentration (tmax). The results indicated that there were no statistically significant differences (P > 0.05) between the logarithmic transformed AUC0-infinity and Cmax, values, between test and reference formulation. The 90% confidence interval for the ratio of the logarithmic transformed AUC0-t, AUC0-infinity, and Cmax were within the bioequivalence limit of 0.8-1.25 and the relative bioavailability of test formulation was 96.82% to that of reference formulation.
-
Arzneimittel Forsch · Jan 2009
Randomized Controlled TrialPharmacokinetics and bioequivalence study of a fixed dose combination of rabeprazole and itopride in healthy Indian volunteers.
The aim of the present study was to compare the pharmacokinetics of rabeprazole (CAS 117976-89-3) and itopride (CAS 122898-67-3) after oral administration of a rabeprazole (20 mg)-itopride (150 mg) fixed dose combination (FDC) in healthy human volunteers. The bioequivalence of two formulations (test and reference) was determined in 12 healthy Indian male volunteers (age: 25.25 +/- 4.69 years; weight: 60.50 +/- 5.04 kg) in a randomized, single-dose, two-period, two-treatment crossover study. Both formulations were administered orally as a single dose, with the treatments separated by a washout period of 1 week. ⋯ General linear model (GLM) procedures were used in which sources of variation were subject, treatment and period. The results indicated that there were no statistically significant differences (P > 0.05) between the logarithmically transformed AUC(0-infinity) and Cmax values between test and reference formulation. The 90% confidence interval for the ratio of the logarithmically transformed AUC(0-t), AUC(0-infinity) and Cmax were within the bioequivalence limits of 0.8-1.25 and the relative bioavailability of rabeprazole and itopride test and reference formulations was 98.24 and 93.65%, respectively.