Arzneimittel Forsch
-
Arzneimittel Forsch · Jan 2007
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study[Comparative clinical study of two dexamethasone phosphate-containing ophthalmics].
For the drug application of the already known active ingredient dexamethasone dihydrogen phosphate disodium salt (CAS 2392-39-4) for ocular use clinical data on the efficacy and safety were required by the drug regulatory agency. The comparison of the pharmaceutical properties had already shown that no differences in clinical use had to be expected. The results of a double-blind, randomised, comparative clinical study on 210 patients prove that no differences between test and comparator product could be observed. This case shows that the demand for clinical trials to proof therapeutic equivalence should be done with a sense of proportion related to the specific situation.
-
Arzneimittel Forsch · Jan 2007
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative StudyBioeqivalence assessment of two domperidone 1 tablet formulations.
A randomized, single-dose, crossover study was conducted to assess the bioavailability of two domperidone (CAS 57808-66-9) tablet formulations, Domperidone (test) and a commercially available original preparation (reference) under fasting conditions. A 10 mg dose of each formulation was administered to 36 healthy male volunteers with a one-week washout period, 17 blood samples were collected over 48 h, plasma concentrations of domperidone were analyzed by a locally validated LC-MS-MS assay, and the pharmacokinetic parameters were determined by the standard non-compartmental method. ⋯ ANOVA revealed significant subject's effect for AU4C(0 --> t), AUC((0 -->infinity), C(max), and t1/2 with a ratio of the inter-subject to intra-subject coefficient of variation of 2.10, 1.55, 1.10, and 1.02, respectively. The results indicate that the two formulations are equivalent in relation to the extent and rate of absorption and confirm the previously reported marked intra-individual variations in the pharmacokinetics of domperidone.
-
Arzneimittel Forsch · Jan 2007
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative StudyComparative pharmacokinetics of two tablet formulations of amoxicillin: bioequivalence assessment.
The aim of the present study was to compare the bioavailability of amoxicillin (CAS 26787-78-0) from two different amoxicillin tablets (Demoksil 1 g tablet as test preparation and 1 g tablet of the originator product as reference preparation). The study was conducted according to an open-label, randomised two-period cross-over design with a wash-out phase of 4-7 days. Blood samples for pharmacokinetic profiling were taken up to 10 h post-dose, and amoxicillin plasma concentrations were determined with a validated LC-MS/ MS method. ⋯ Plasma elimination half-lives (t(1/2)) of 1.64 h (test) and 1.65 h (reference) were determined. Both primary target parameters, AUC(0-infinity) and C(max) were tested parametrically by analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the 90% confidence intervals were between 96.76%-108.46% (AUC(0-infinity)) and 97.80%-111.98% (C(max)). Bioequivalence between test and reference preparation was demonstrated since for both parameters, AUC and C(max) the 90% confidence intervals of the T/R-ratios of logarithmically transformed data were in the generally accepted range of 80%-125%.
-
Arzneimittel Forsch · Jan 2007
Randomized Controlled TrialBioequivalence study of a sustained release fixed dose combination capsule containing esomeprazole and domperidone in healthy subjects.
The study was designed to determine the relative bioavailability of two sustained release fixed dose combination (FDC) products of two manufacturers containing esomeprazole (CAS 326602-80-6) 40 mg and domperidone (CAS 57808-66-9) 30 mg in 24 healthy male volunteers. The pharmacokinetics of esomeprazole and domperidone individually after oral administration of tablet formulation has been extensively evaluated in adult volunteers. However, no published data are available regarding the combined pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of this particular FDC. ⋯ These findings clearly indicate that the two products are bioequivalent in terms of rate and extent of drug absorption. Both preparations were well tolerated with no adverse reactions throughout the study.
-
Arzneimittel Forsch · Jan 2007
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative StudyBioequivalence assessment of two capsule formulations of omeprazole in healthy volunteers.
A randomized, single-dose, crossover study was conducted to assess the bioavailability of two omeprazole (CAS 73590-58-6) capsule formulations, Emilok (test) and a commercially available original preparation (reference), under fasting conditions. A 20 mg dose of each formulation was administered to 36 healthy male volunteers with one-week washout period, 17 blood samples were collected over 12 h, plasma omeprazole concentrations were determined by a locally validated high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) assay, and omeprazole pharmacokinetic parameters were analyzed by the standard non-compartmental method. ⋯ ANOVA revealed significant subject's effect for AUC(0 --> t), AUC(0 --> infinity), Cmax, and t1/2 with a ratio of the inter-subject to intra-subject coefficient of variation of 3.66, 3.92, 1.25, and 1.46, respectively. The results confirm the presence of marked individual variations in the pharmacokinetics of omeprazole and indicate that the two formulations are equivalent in relation to the extent but not the rate of absorption.