Arzneimittel Forsch
-
Arzneimittel Forsch · Jan 2007
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative StudyBioequivalence assessment of two capsule formulations of omeprazole in healthy volunteers.
A randomized, single-dose, crossover study was conducted to assess the bioavailability of two omeprazole (CAS 73590-58-6) capsule formulations, Emilok (test) and a commercially available original preparation (reference), under fasting conditions. A 20 mg dose of each formulation was administered to 36 healthy male volunteers with one-week washout period, 17 blood samples were collected over 12 h, plasma omeprazole concentrations were determined by a locally validated high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) assay, and omeprazole pharmacokinetic parameters were analyzed by the standard non-compartmental method. ⋯ ANOVA revealed significant subject's effect for AUC(0 --> t), AUC(0 --> infinity), Cmax, and t1/2 with a ratio of the inter-subject to intra-subject coefficient of variation of 3.66, 3.92, 1.25, and 1.46, respectively. The results confirm the presence of marked individual variations in the pharmacokinetics of omeprazole and indicate that the two formulations are equivalent in relation to the extent but not the rate of absorption.
-
Arzneimittel Forsch · Jan 2007
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative StudyBioequivalence study of a fixed dose combination of nitazoxanide and ofloxacin in Indian healthy volunteers.
The pharmacokinetics of nitazoxanide (CAS 55981-09-4) and ofloxacin (CAS 82419-36-1) has been extensively evaluated in adult human volunteers individually after oral administration of tablet formulation. However, no published data is available regarding the combined pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of this particular fixed dose combination. In light of the above, a clinical study was designed to evaluate the bioequivalence of two fixed dose combination (FDC) products of two manufacturers containing nitazoxanide 500 mg and ofloxacin 200 mg in healthy Indian male volunteers. ⋯ Thus, these findings clearly indicate that the two products are bioequivalent in terms of rate and extent of drug absorption. Both the preparations were well tolerated with no adverse reactions seen throughout the study.
-
Arzneimittel Forsch · Jan 2007
Effect of benidipine hydrochloride, a long-acting T-type calcium channel blocker, on blood pressure and renal function in hypertensive patients with diabetes mellitus. Analysis after switching from cilnidipine to benidipine.
Calcium channel blockers are commonly used to treat hypertension, and are known to generally act on the L-type calcium channel. Recent studies have shown, however, that some calcium channel blockers also block other calcium channel subtypes, including N- and T-type channels. Cilnidipine (CAS 132203-70-4) is an L- and N-type calcium channel blocker, and benidipine hydrochloride (benidipine, CAS 91599-74-5) is known to inhibit the T-type as well as L- and N-type calcium channels. In this study, effects of switching from cilnidipine to benidipine on blood pressure (BP) lowering and renal functions were investigated in order to clarify the physiological properties of the T-type calcium channel. ⋯ These results demonstrate that benidipine has a more potent antihypertensive effect than cilnidipine and also a renoprotective effect, indicating the high usefulness of benidipine in hypertensive patients with diabetes. T-type calcium channel blockade was suggested to be possibly involved in the enoprotective effect of benidipine.
-
Arzneimittel Forsch · Jan 2007
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative StudyPharmacokinetics and bioequivalence study of ranitidine film tablets in healthy male subjects.
The aim of the present study was to compare the bioavailability of ranitidine (CAS 66357-35-5) from two different ranitidine hydrochloride (CAS 66357-59-3) film tablets (Ranitab 150 mg film tablets as test preparation and 150 mg film tablets of the originator product as reference preparation). The study was conducted according to an open-label, randomised two-period cross-over design with a wash-out phase of 9 days. Blood samples for pharmacokinetic profiling were taken up to 24 h post-dose, and ranitidine plasma concentrations were determined with a validated HPLC method with UV-detection. ⋯ Plasma elimination half-lives (t1/2) of 2.78 h (test) and 2.89 h (reference) were determined. Both primary target parameters AUC(0-infinity) and Cmax were tested parametrically by analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the 90% confidence intervals were between 91.93 %-106.98 % (AUC (0-infinity) and 92.34%-118.85% (Cmax). Bioequivalence between test and reference preparation was demonstrated since for both parameters AUC and Cmax the 90 % confidence intervals of the T/R ratios of logarithmically transformed data were in the generally accepted range of 80 %-125 %.
-
Arzneimittel Forsch · Jan 2007
Randomized Controlled TrialBioequivalence study of sultamicillin suspensions.
Sultamicillin (CAS 76497-13-7) is a prodrug combination of ampicillin (CAS 69-53-4) and sulbactam (CAS 68373-14-8), with the antibiotic ampicillin and the beta-lactamase inhibitor sulbactam chemically linked as double ester. The present study was performed to investigate the relative bioavailability and to assess the bioequivalence of two different sultamicillin suspensions (Devasid 250 mg/5 ml as test preparation and 375 mg/7.5 ml of the originator product as reference preparation). Twenty-four healthy male volunteers received equal doses of the sultamicillin preparations according to an open, randomised, single-dose, two-period cross-over design with a wash-out phase of 7 days. ⋯ Plasma elimination half-lives (t(1/2)) of 1.04 h (ampicillin, test), 1.03 h (ampicillin, reference), 1.26 h (sulbactam, Devasid) and 1.00 h (sulbactam, reference) were determined. Both primary target parameters AUC(0-infinity) and C(max) of ampicillin and sulbactam were tested parametrically by analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the 90% confidence intervals were between 84.58%-117.80% (AUC(0-infinity), ampicillin), 92.37%-119.93% (C(max), ampicillin), 85.81%-120.50% (AUC(0-infinity), sulbactam) and 88.41%-117.57% (C(max), sulbactam). Bioequivalence between test and reference preparation was demonstrated since for both parameters AUC and C(max) the 90% confidence intervals of the T/R-ratios of logarithmically transformed data were in the generally accepted range of 80%-125%.