Clin Pharmacokinet
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study
Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of rivaroxaban--an oral, direct factor Xa inhibitor--in patients undergoing major orthopaedic surgery.
There is a clinical need for novel oral anticoagulants with predictable pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Rivaroxaban is an oral direct Factor Xa (FXa) inhibitor in clinical development for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disorders. This analysis was performed to characterize the population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of rivaroxaban in patients participating in two phase II, double-blind, randomized, active-comparator-controlled studies of twice-daily rivaroxaban for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after total hip- or knee-replacement surgery. ⋯ This population analysis in patients undergoing major orthopaedic surgery demonstrated that rivaroxaban has predictable, dose-dependent pharmacokinetics that were well described by an oral one-compartment model and affected by expected covariates. Rivaroxaban exposure could be assessed using the prothrombin time, if necessary, but not the international normalized ratio. The findings suggested that fixed dosing of rivaroxaban may be possible in patients undergoing major orthopaedic surgery.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study
A clinical comparison of slow- and rapid-escalation treprostinil dosing regimens in patients with pulmonary hypertension.
Subcutaneous treprostinil is an effective treatment for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). A previous pivotal study indicated that infusion site pain was dose dependent and resulted in suboptimal dose escalation by week 12 and a reduced clinical benefit. We hypothesized that a rapid-escalation treprostinil dosing regimen would be as safe and effective as a slow-escalation dosing regimen. ⋯ The rapid-dosing regimen is as safe and effective as the slow-escalation regimen and may be associated with even better clinical outcomes. Infusion site pain is not dose dependent.
-
Coumarin derivatives, including warfarin, acenocoumarol and phenprocoumon, are the drugs of choice for long-term treatment and prevention of thromboembolic events. The management of oral anticoagulation is challenging because of a large variability in the dose-response relationship, which is in part caused by genetic polymorphisms. The narrow therapeutic range may result in bleeding complications or recurrent thrombosis, especially during the initial phase of treatment. ⋯ Genetic polymorphism in further enzymes and structures involved in the effect of anticoagulants such as gamma-glutamylcarboxylase, glutathione S-transferase A1, microsomal epoxide hydrolase and apolipoprotein E appear to be of negligible importance. Despite the clear effects of CYP2C9 and VKORC1 variants, these polymorphisms explain less than half of the interindividual variability in the dose response to oral anticoagulants. Thus, while individuals at the extremes of the dose requirements are likely to benefit, the overall clinical merits of a genotype-adapted anticoagulant treatment regimen in the entire patient populations remain to be determined in further prospective clinical studies.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
Population pharmacodynamic modelling of aspirin- and Ibuprofen-induced inhibition of platelet aggregation in healthy subjects.
The objective of this study was to develop a mechanism-based pharmacodynamic model that characterizes the antiplatelet effects of aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) and ibuprofen alone and in combination. ⋯ A mechanism-based pharmacodynamic model has been developed that characterizes the antiplatelet effects of aspirin and ibuprofen, alone and concomitantly, and predicts a significant inhibition of aspirin antiplatelet effects in the presence of a typical ibuprofen dosing regimen.
-
Review Comparative Study
Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of desloratadine, fexofenadine and levocetirizine : a comparative review.
Second-generation histamine H(1) receptor antagonists were developed to provide efficacious treatment of allergic rhinitis (AR) and chronic idiopathic urticaria (CIU) while decreasing adverse effects associated with first-generation agents. When comparing the efficacy and safety profiles of the newest second-generation antihistamines - desloratadine, fexofenadine and levocetirizine - many pharmacological and clinical criteria must be considered. Most importantly, these elements should not be evaluated separately but, rather, as parts of a puzzle that create a whole picture. ⋯ Desloratadine and fexofenadine do not impair cognitive or psychomotor functioning and are comparable with placebo in terms of somnolence. Based on these pharmacological characteristics, as well as clinical endpoints such as symptom scores, quality-of-life surveys, inflammatory cell counts and investigators' global evaluations, we conclude that desloratadine, fexofenadine and levocetirizine are all efficacious treatments for AR and CIU. However, differences among the antihistamines in relation to a lack of significant interaction with drug transporter molecules and somnolence in excess of placebo may provide some advantages for the overall profile of desloratadine compared with fexofenadine and levocetirizine.