Clin Pharmacokinet
-
Review
Impact of stereoselectivity on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of antiarrhythmic drugs.
Many antiarrhythmic drugs introduced into the market during the past three decades have a chiral centre in their structure and are marketed as racemates. Most of these agents, including disopyramide, encainide, flecainide, mexiletine, propafenone and tocainide, belong to class I antiarrhythmics, whereas verapamil is a class IV antiarrhythmic agent. Except for encainide and flecainide, there is substantial stereoselectivity in one or more of the pharmacological actions of chiral antiarrhythmics, with the activity of enantiomers differing by as much as 100-fold or more for some of these drugs. ⋯ Similarly, there is no stereoselectivity in the renal clearance of tocainide, a drug that undergoes tubular reabsorption in addition to glomerular filtration. Overall, substantial stereoselectivity has been observed in both the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of chiral antiarrhythmic agents. Because the effects of these drugs are related to their plasma concentrations, this information is of special clinical relevance.
-
Rapacuronium is an aminosteroidal nondepolarising neuromuscular blocking agent (NMBA). Its neuromuscular blocking effects have a different time course to those of most currently available agents. It also has lower potency than many of the other NMBAs. ⋯ Because it gives rapid onset in a dose consistent with brief duration of action, it was hoped that rapacuronium might be a suitable alternative to suxamethonium. It does not have the problems associated with suxamethonium, but its use is associated with bronchospasm, the incidence of which is dose-related. Rapacuronium has been withdrawn from sale because of this adverse effect, and its future availability is uncertain.
-
Although epilepsy affects men and women equally, there are many women's health issues in epilepsy, especially for women of childbearing age. These issues, which include menstrual cycle influences on seizure activity (catamenial epilepsy), interactions of contraceptives with antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), pharmacokinetic changes during pregnancy, teratogenicity and the safety of breastfeeding, challenge both the woman with epilepsy and the many healthcare providers involved in her care. Although the information in the literature on women's issues in epilepsy has grown steeply in recent years, there are many examples showing that much work is yet to be done. ⋯ AED dosage adjustments may be necessary during pregnancy and should be based on clinical symptoms, not entirely on serum drug concentrations. Many groups have turned their attention to women's issues in epilepsy and have developed clinical practice guidelines. Although the future holds promise in this area, many questions and the need for progress remain.
-
The blood-brain barrier (BBB) is a gate that controls the influx and efflux of a wide variety of substances and consequently restricts the delivery of drugs into the central nervous system (CNS). Brain tumours may disrupt the function of this barrier locally and nonhomogeneously. Therefore, the delivery of drugs to brain tumours has long been a controversial subject. ⋯ Systemic toxicity remains the limiting factor for most methods that use intravascular delivery. This review evaluates the strategies used to increase drug delivery in view of current knowledge of drug pharmacokinetics and its relevance to clinical studies of chemosensitive brain tumours. The main focus is on primary CNS lymphoma, as it is a chemosensitive brain tumour and its management routinely utilises specialised strategies to enhance drug delivery to the affected CNS compartments.
-
Genetic variability in drug response occurs as a result of molecular alterations at the level of drug-metabolising enzymes, drug targets/receptors, and drug transport proteins. In this paper, we discuss the possibility that therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in the future will involve not the mere measurement and interpretation of drug concentrations but will include both traditional TDM and pharmacogenetics-oriented TDM. In contrast to traditional TDM, which cannot be performed until after a drug is administered to the patient. pharmacogenetics-oriented TDM can be conducted even before treatment begins. ⋯ However, prospective studies of phaymacogenetics-oriented TDM must be performed to determine its efficacy and cost effectiveness in optimising therapeutic effects while minimising toxicity. In the future, in addition to targeting a patient's drug concentrations within a therapeutic range, pharmacists are likely to be making dosage recommendations for individual drugs on the basis of the individual patient's genotype. As we enter the era of personalised drug therapy, we will be able to identify not only the best drug to be administered to a particular patient, but also the most effective and safest dosage from the outset of therapy.