The Journal of surgical research
-
Comparative Study
Is less more? Laparoscopic versus open Ladd's procedure in children with malrotation.
With the advent of minimally invasive techniques, laparoscopic Ladd's procedure is increasingly used to treat children with malrotation, yet evidence regarding its safety and efficacy is lacking. We hypothesize that operative and postoperative outcomes with the open technique are superior to the laparoscopic Ladd's procedure. ⋯ Although minimally invasive approaches are becoming increasingly used, no evidence supports laparoscopic superiority over open Ladd's procedure. We found that open surgery was associated with shorter operating times and fewer clinic visits. Furthermore, laparotomy remains the favored procedure for patients presenting with volvulus.
-
Surgery for anorectal diseases is thought to cause significant pain postoperatively. There is little known regarding standardized opioid-prescribing trends and patient use following surgery for anorectal diseases. We aimed to evaluate and analyze opioid-prescribing trends and patient use for outpatient anorectal operations. ⋯ Most patients had adequate pain control after anorectal surgery with little to no use of opioids and that more than 80% of opioid pills prescribed were not consumed. We intend to standardize our prescribing opioid quantities for outpatient anorectal operations to reflect this reduced use.
-
Adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) are capable of secreting regenerative growth factors and replacing multiple tissue types. Although current literature suggests that ASCs accelerate wound healing and reduce scarring, the dose-response relationship has not been adequately investigated in large animals. We sought to establish a porcine model to optimize dose and delivery. ⋯ Doses up to 3.0 × 106 cells/cm2 were well-tolerated. High-dose ASCs accelerate wound contraction, enhance neovascularization, and may improve scar quality in excisional wounds healing by secondary intention. Doses greater than those previously used may be necessary to achieve desired effects.
-
Multicenter Study Observational Study
Assessment of the predictive value of the International Classification of Diseases Injury Severity Score for trauma mortality in urban India.
Trauma is the cause of 1.2 million deaths in India annually. Injury severity scores play an important role in trauma research and care because these scores enable the adjustment of trauma severity when comparing mortality outcomes. The generalizability of the International Classification of Diseases Injury Severity Score (ICISS) between different populations is not fully known, and the validity of the ICISS has not been assessed in the Indian context. The aim of this study was to assess the predictive performances of three international versions of the ICISS, derived from data from Australia, New Zealand and pooled data from seven different high-income countries, in trauma patients admitted to four public hospitals in urban India. ⋯ None of the international versions of the ICISS adequately predicted mortality within the study population, indicating the need for an ICISS version specifically adapted to the Indian context.
-
The optimal timing of appendectomy for acute appendicitis has been analyzed with mixed results. We hypothesized that delayed appendectomy would be associated with increased 30-d morbidity and mortality. ⋯ Data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program demonstrate similar outcomes of appendectomy for acute appendicitis when the operation is performed on HD 1 or 2; however, outcomes are significantly worse for appendectomies delayed until HD 3. Increased complications in this group are likely not attributable to HD of operation, but rather decreased baseline health status and procedure type.